Martin Luther King Jr.

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • The Bubba Effect

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    19   0   0
    May 13, 2010
    6,221
    113
    High Rockies
    By "his people" do you mean Americans?

    No, not just Americans.

    To be specific, I did not mean "his people" as code for "colored" or "poor" or "christian" or "oppressed". I intended to refer to him as a man dedicated to the service of those he felt the duty to serve. I intended to side step the tangles of class and political ideology that were gaining in this thread by making a statement that in and of itself I could be sure of.

    King served his people.

    I pray I do as much for my people.
     

    steveh_131

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    10,046
    83
    Porter County
    MLK was courageous at a time when that didn't mean that someone might criticize you, it meant someone was most likely actively planning your murder or your incarceration. He risked and gave his life for the best of reasons: freedom. Real, pure, down to earth, honest to god freedom. Taxes are anti-freedom to be sure, but in the big picture, getting hung from a tree with barbed wire because you tried to vote wins on the linear scale of things to fight for.

    Dr. King stood up to a corrupt, bigoted, and unjust Police State. He did so not only in speeches, but in peaceful civil disobedience. He was arrested on many occasions for breaking unconscionable racist laws that made him into a second-class citizen. He spoke out against the Vietnam War and the horrible use of the draft. He challenged the oppressive status quo. He was a leader when America needed one, and people followed using his peaceful example. He died serving his cause.

    I must admit that I had him pigeonholed and dismissed as a socialist.

    You guys made some very good points and I have revised my opinion on MLK. He went wrong in a few areas is celebrated for a lot of wrong reasons, but he certainly deserves respect for the good that he accomplished.
     

    Kagnew

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 30, 2009
    2,618
    48
    Columbus
    King articulated himself.

    In a September 1967 speech in Atlanta, King condemned capitalism as an inherently unjust economic system and declared that his movement was devoted to "restructuring the whole of American society." In Where Do We Go From Here: Chaos or Community?, a book published in that same year, King endorsed the time-honored socialist demand for a guaranteed minimum annual wage, which would be "pegged to the median income of society" and would "automatically increase as the total social income grows." In this particular example of literary "borrowing," King was merging his voice with that of Karl Marx, who coined the phrase "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need."

    King also bared his socialist inclinations in a lengthy interview he granted to Playboy. In the magazine’s January 1965 issue, King moralized that "all of America’s wealth today could not adequately compensate its Negroes for his [sic] centuries of exploitation and humiliation." Anticipating the contemporary movement demanding "reparations" for slavery, he insisted that black Americans be given preferential economic treatment. Of course, this would provoke similar demands from "the disadvantaged of all races" — a prospect King welcomed: "I do not intend that this program of economic aid should apply only to the Negro.... We must develop a federal program of public works, retraining and jobs for all...."

    Clearly, the Socialist Party USA identifies King as a kindred Socialist...

    http://www.socialistparty-usa.org/literature/mlking-flyer.pdf

    That is not to say that King did not bring attention to significant issues.

    I am simply saying that his solution to those issues consistently involved expanding the role of the State.



    :yesway:
     

    Al B

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 21, 2009
    266
    18
    EM78 South IN
    This. I do have great respect for MLK Jr., but the laws that were passed after his death really haven't done much to improve the problems with racism and bigotry that plague this country. It's kind of like praising a pastor for successfully lobbying congress to make abortions illegal. People gotta change their hearts and minds for a real change to come.

    Plague? Where is this going on? I hear this on the news and read it in articles, but I don't see it on the street. If it is so blatant, then where is it?
    I have had ONE instance of where blacks were singled out by a fellow I met a few years ago. He did not want blacks to be in lodge with him. I pointed out to him that if they were in lodge that they have walked the exact same path he and I had. He did stop and think about it then admitted he was wrong.

    The worst racism I have ever heard, and I have heard it MANY time was directly at Native Americans. I have heard vile and nasty things said. I have friends that WERE told to leave a restaurant a few years ago when they went in for supper after a PowWow.

    Lol, yeah, I guess it would depend on which side of the Thanksgiving table you sat... I'm pretty sure there are some "native americans" out there wishing that maybe they had just let the darn "pilgrims" starve (or maybe taken a more active role in their demise).

    See above!



    MLK Did some wonderful things and I respect him for it.
     

    thebishopp

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 26, 2010
    1,286
    38
    Indiana
    Plague? Where is this going on? I hear this on the news and read it in articles, but I don't see it on the street. If it is so blatant, then where is it?
    I have had ONE instance of where blacks were singled out by a fellow I met a few years ago. He did not want blacks to be in lodge with him. I pointed out to him that if they were in lodge that they have walked the exact same path he and I had. He did stop and think about it then admitted he was wrong.

    The worst racism I have ever heard, and I have heard it MANY time was directly at Native Americans. I have heard vile and nasty things said. I have friends that WERE told to leave a restaurant a few years ago when they went in for supper after a PowWow.



    See above!



    MLK Did some wonderful things and I respect him for it.


    about 10 years ago my father was headed back home (retired Honolulu PD settled in KY, Ft. Knox area due to cost of living) after helping pass out blankets at an indiana reservation somewhere southwest. He stopped at a diner in southern KY and was told "sorry we don't serve your kind here". He is half Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) and as he has gotten older really looks like it. He was pretty pissed. Vietnam vet, retired HPD Sgt. He has also gotten bs from tsa when he has flown with his channupa (mainly them saying "you injuns smoke weed in this don't you" and one time the tsa agent smacked the pipe down cracking the head - he doesn't fly any more).
     

    J_Wales

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 18, 2011
    2,952
    36
    about 10 years ago my father was headed back home (retired Honolulu PD settled in KY, Ft. Knox area due to cost of living) after helping pass out blankets at an indiana reservation somewhere southwest. He stopped at a diner in southern KY and was told "sorry we don't serve your kind here". He is half Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) and as he has gotten older really looks like it. He was pretty pissed. Vietnam vet, retired HPD Sgt. He has also gotten bs from tsa when he has flown with his channupa (mainly them saying "you injuns smoke weed in this don't you" and one time the tsa agent smacked the pipe down cracking the head - he doesn't fly any more).


    The first requirement for being a TSA toady is that you be an assh*le with a God complex.

    The second is that you be a blind, bleating sheep with no capacity for independent cognitive processes.

    The third is that you behave like an assh*le with a God complex that in reality is a blind, bleating sheep with no capacity for independent cognitive processes each day you show up at your post.

    And to think I am forced to pay for these assh*les.
     

    J_Wales

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 18, 2011
    2,952
    36
    If you were not allowed to take out a loan, start a business, or buy a house in any community you could afford, would you think Capitalism was fair?
    If you were not allowed to take out a loan, start a business, or buy a house in any community you could afford, would you think Capitalism was fair?

    Was that capitalism or statism?

    From what I understand, the state had encroached upon grounds beyond its boundaries in creating the restrictions you describe.

    That sounds more like statism to me.

    In capitalism, one would be free to sell a home to whomever he, in his own judgement, deemed to be the best party with which to do a transaction.
     

    Kagnew

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 30, 2009
    2,618
    48
    Columbus
    If you were not allowed to take out a loan, start a business, or buy a house in any community you could afford, would you think Capitalism was fair?

    And how, pray tell, would any of those acts be tenets of capitalism? Capitalism is an economic system - not a social system.
     

    dross

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 27, 2009
    8,699
    48
    Monument, CO
    If you were not allowed to take out a loan, start a business, or buy a house in any community you could afford, would you think Capitalism was fair?

    And how, pray tell, would any of those acts be tenets of capitalism? Capitalism is an economic system - not a social system.

    It takes the state to enforce racism.

    If you look at South Africa there was a booming black market economy going on where skilled black workers would work for the white community illegally. It took the law to enforce apartheid, not people's opinion.

    That's the beauty of capitalism, it prompts people to do what's right because it's in their best interest. Not in every instance, but often.
     

    Femme Assise

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 9, 2012
    65
    6
    Although I do not agree with many policies legislation has put in place over the years to safeguard African American populations, Martin Luther King was one of the greatest men of his time. He was not just a good speaker; He was a source of confidence, hope, and pride for African Americans around the nation during the 50's and 60's. He was an inspiration then, as he is now, to young men and women who look to his works .

    I have the upmost respect for MLK. A man who is willing to stand in the face of overwhelming oppression and give the ultimate sacrifice defending his wife, children, brothers and neighbors, so that the chains enslaving African Americans from enjoying the right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness could be loosened, deserves our recognition. MLK was just a man and nothing more; however, he sewed the seeds necessary for bringing out African Americans from under the cruelty and discrimination of oppression and socioeconomic inequality.
     

    Kagnew

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 30, 2009
    2,618
    48
    Columbus
    That's the beauty of capitalism, it prompts people to do what's right because it's in their best interest. Not in every instance, but often.

    Good point. If I recall correctly, all of the original 13 states had slavery at one time. The northern states soon enough realized that it was not a good fit with their growing industrialism and abolished it, while the southern states found that it nicely complemented their agricultural base and maintained it (as long as they could, anyway).
     

    dross

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 27, 2009
    8,699
    48
    Monument, CO
    Good point. If I recall correctly, all of the original 13 states had slavery at one time. The northern states soon enough realized that it was not a good fit with their growing industrialism and abolished it, while the southern states found that it nicely complemented their agricultural base and maintained it (as long as they could, anyway).

    I've heard a pretty good argument made that slavery is actually more expensive than other methods of production. For one, you have a work force that cares nothing for your production, and innovation completely dies. You get stuck in one place while the world moves on around you. Which may also explain why the North was twenty or more years ahead of the South at that time.
     

    Que

    Meekness ≠ Weakness
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 98%
    48   1   0
    Feb 20, 2009
    16,373
    83
    Blacksburg
    And how, pray tell, would any of those acts be tenets of capitalism? Capitalism is an economic system - not a social system.

    These are advantages born out of capitalism; advantages that certain members of the society were not allowed to embrace.
     

    J_Wales

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 18, 2011
    2,952
    36
    These are advantages born out of capitalism; advantages that certain members of the society were not allowed to embrace.

    True; the state saw to it.

    Statism is an empire of evil... and I say that with all sincerity. It is the arch enemy of Liberty.
     

    Que

    Meekness ≠ Weakness
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 98%
    48   1   0
    Feb 20, 2009
    16,373
    83
    Blacksburg
    True; the state saw to it.

    Statism is an empire of evil... and I say that with all sincerity. It is the arch enemy of Liberty.

    I would like to somewhat agree with an argument that is made concerning this point, today. Yes, people of color were prevented from being a part of this great society and partaking in the benefits of freedom . . . then! Today, there are no Jim Crow laws, although racism still exists, but there are no laws that prevent anyone from living wherever they can afford, applying to attend any school or job, opening a business; going anywhere, etc. All excuses have been nullified because the government is allowed to legalize discrimination, racism, and bigotry.

    The government is no longer in the business of legalizing racism, but there are still people in powerful places that follow those practices. Whenever these issues raise their evil heads, there are ways to deal with it, but self-elected actors such as Jackson have abused the power that those actions used to have. For example, if a business promoted racist practices to be performed among its employees, the power of the dollar could be used to change their practices. People could be brought to a clear understanding of what the store has done as asked to take their money elsewhere. However, today, these attempts are useless, because of the ulterior motives of the "leaders." Still, for wherever true racism (not bigotry, cultural misunderstandings, or personal dislike) is evident, it can be dealt with.

    There is nothing that can stop a person who refuses to give up. That was the main lesson to be taken away from the life of Dr. King. In any of our efforts to be successful, we may not live to partake in the promise, but being able to pave the road for our children and grandchildren is worth more than life itself. Personally, I strive to live life looking toward the future, but I'm always pushed by history.

    There are still people who choose to live in the past on both sides of this argument. I refuse to be caught up in the ignorance of either side, because it's just not productive to point fingers instead of putting our hands to work.
     

    J_Wales

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 18, 2011
    2,952
    36
    "In any of our efforts to be successful, we may not live to partake in the promise, but being able to pave the road for our children and grandchildren is worth more than life itself. Personally, I strive to live life looking toward the future, but I'm always pushed by history.

    There are still people who choose to live in the past on both sides of this argument. I refuse to be caught up in the ignorance of either side, because it's just not productive to point fingers instead of putting our hands to work."

    Well said.
     
    Top Bottom