These are advantages born out of capitalism; advantages that certain members of the society were not allowed to embrace.
I can only repeat that capitalism is an economic system. There is nothing about an economic system, per se, which would foster discrimination.
If I made $100,000 in 2011, my federal income tax would be approximately $17,250 based on the tax tables assuming I am married and file a joint return. My effective federal income tax rate is 17.25%
If the guy down the street made $50,000 in 2011, his federal income tax would be approximately $6,650 based on the tax tables assuming he is married and filed a joint return. His effective federal income rate is 13.3%
If the next guy down the street made $17,000 in 2011, his federal income tax would be $0 based on the tax tables assuming he is married and filed a joint return. His effective federal income tax rate is 0%.
It is unjust that some should have their labor taxed by the state at more favorable rates than others while some do not have their labor taxed at all.
Do I have a moral responsibility to disobey this law since it does not treat the labor of all taxpayers equally?
If we were really serious about ending the injustice, we'd follow in MLK's tradition of peaceful civil disobedience.It is unjust that some should have their labor taxed by the state at more favorable rates than others while some do not have their labor taxed at all.
Do I have a moral responsibility to disobey this law since it does not treat the labor of all taxpayers equally?
I wonder if mlk would view the progressive tax system outlined above as unjust.
What do you think?
It's impossible for one to tell what they think? To give an opinion? To make an educated assessment and tell why?
Let me rephrase. Yes, an opinion can certainly be offered, but a valid question has been raised that should be addressed without going down the rabbit hole of discussing what a dead man would have done. Anyone is definitely free to answer your question, but I'm wondering what are we doing today?
Not everyone who marched with MLK agreed with him, liked him, or even supported him. However, they all agreed that working together to achieve a common goal was in their best interest. Today, people talk about liberty, democracy, and our great republic, but can't even agree to support a presidential candidate that outwardly holds the truest to the principles of these tenets. So, how in the world can free Americans come together to properly demonstrate disagreement with injustices we see today? Some have even refused to vote!
Agreed.
Do you view the fact that people are taxed unequally on their labor and the fruit of their labor an injustice?
Today, people talk about liberty, democracy, and our great republic, but can't even agree to support a presidential candidate that outwardly holds the truest to the principles of these tenets. So, how in the world can free Americans come together to properly demonstrate disagreement with injustices we see today? Some have even refused to vote!
Well said.
That some do not even bother to vote is infuriating to me.
I've always figured that if one does not make the effort to be informed and to vote one forfeits one's right to complain!
For as long as I can remember around my home it was said, "if you don't vote, don't b!tch..."
That's an impossible question for anyone to answer. MLK saw the injustices of his time and dealt with them. The better question is, if injustices persist today, perpetuated by whomever, what are you/we willing to do about it? Are people still willing to deal with the repercussions that result from lawful and non-violent civil disobedience?