Marine homecoming kiss

[ocsdor]

I think jumping up in the guys arms and wrapping his legs around him is very inappropriate, especially while wearing the uniform.

 

[fullmetaljesus]

I would have liked the picture better if the soldier had two or three of his wives kissing him upon his safe return, (but I guess that would be illegal and IMMORAL!).

not sure what you're getting at here....

 

[traderdan]

Minority rule

not sure what you're getting at here....

Government cannot legislate morality.It should not deal with sexual issues between consenting adults.I am just pointing out that a "Bigamist" can go to prison....We have allowed a noisy minority to change the rule of law. (PS-I only have and want one wife)

 

[printcraft]

 

[jve153]

to each their own. as long as he is not trying to kiss me, im ok with it. thank you for serving.

 

[fullmetaljesus]

Government cannot legislate morality.It should not deal with sexual issues between consenting adults.I am just pointing out that a "Bigamist" can go to prison....We have allowed a noisy minority to change the rule of law. (PS-I only have and want one wife)

we need more of this:

 

[mrjarrell]

we need more of this:

You just made Rick Santorum puke. As for the Marine, welcome home!

 

[traderdan]

I agree. Let us all be free to express and defend our opinions,not with hatred but with intellectual logic.Poor behavior is sometimes best ignored.

 

[jdhaines]

Good for him, and glad he made it home safe. From the link...

er though!

 

[ATOMonkey]

Now we're talking!!

 

[abnk]

Government cannot legislate morality.It should not deal with sexual issues between consenting adults.I am just pointing out that a "Bigamist" can go to prison....We have allowed a noisy minority to change the rule of law. (PS-I only have and want one wife)

Should public nudity be legal?

 

[Sigblaster]

This issue came up from time to time when I was in the Army, and mostly it came down to this:

If that guy was injured and bleeding all over the place, there would be no way I'd risk coming into contact with his blood to render first aid. Same with CPR. He better be able to get himself breathing, because I'm not coming into contact with his saliva.

How many if you would jump right in and get covered in a known homo's blood, with no protective medical gear, to render first aid?

Now tell me that doesn' t hurt readiness.

 

[Sigblaster]

Really? Is this guy better than someone who has never served, but lives an honorable life?

Edited to highlight link.

Apparently, the new doctrine is that tolerance is more important than readiness.

 

[shibumiseeker]

This issue came up from time to time when I was in the Army, and mostly it came down to this:

If that guy was injured and bleeding all over the place, there would be no way I'd risk coming into contact with his blood to render first aid. Same with CPR. He better be able to get himself breathing, because I'm not coming into contact with his saliva.

How many if you would jump right in and get covered in a known homo's blood, with no protective medical gear, to render first aid?

Now tell me that doesn' t hurt readiness.

That's your right to make that decision.

I hope for your sake someone doesn't refuse to render aid to you if you needed it because they didn't like who you were.

Me, when I am working with fellow responders, if one of them were hurt I'd render aid even if I hated them. But that's just the way I roll.

 

[Tripp11]

This issue came up from time to time when I was in the Army, and mostly it came down to this:

If that guy was injured and bleeding all over the place, there would be no way I'd risk coming into contact with his blood to render first aid. Same with CPR. He better be able to get himself breathing, because I'm not coming into contact with his saliva.

How many if you would jump right in and get covered in a known homo's blood, with no protective medical gear, to render first aid?

Now tell me that doesn' t hurt readiness.

Do homosexuals have a monopoly on "I've got a disease that you might get if you exchange bodily fluids with me" signs?

Last I checked, gay or straight, if you exchange bodily fluids with someone, you take the risk of exposure to HIV.

 

[abnk]

That's your right to make that decision.

I hope for your sake someone doesn't refuse to render aid to you if you needed it because they didn't like who you were.

Me, when I am working with fellow responders, if one of them were hurt I'd render aid even if I hated them. But that's just the way I roll.

It's not about hate. It's about reality.

 

[traderdan]

Should public nudity be legal?

Public nudity would be a PUBLIC issue,so it must be dealt with by Government.What is disturbing about these photos is that someone magnified these events by posting and reposting......Our society has broken down to the point that we glorify the unnatural instead of ignoring it...

 

[dom1104]

Do homosexuals have a monopoly on "I've got a disease that you might get if you exchange bodily fluids with me" signs?

Last I checked, gay or straight, if you exchange bodily fluids with someone, you take the risk of exposure to HIV.

As a side note, I just read this recently.

HIV - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

transmission rates for HIV seem to be a LOT lower than I thought they would be.

Blood transfusion being the... "your going to get it" option.

 

[shibumiseeker]

It's not about hate. It's about reality.

It is about reality. Reality is that some people who hate what another person is will take this stance. That's their choice in life and I wouldn't have it any other way, even when it's something that's not part of my moral code.

 

[shibumiseeker]

Public nudity would be a PUBLIC issue,so it must be dealt with by Government.What is disturbing about these photos is that someone magnified these events by posting and reposting......Our society has broken down to the point that we glorify the unnatural instead of ignoring it...

Nah, if it were a kiss between straight people no one at all would comment on it. Because it's not, it draws commentary. Posting it here in this environment where there's a higher percentage of people who will make negative commentary instead of just letting it pass is deliberately stirring the pot. And the predictable crowd who feel the need to make it known they disapprove didn't disappoint.