Been true for a lot of things.asbestos used to be safe... for years.
and then..
not so much
Been true for a lot of things.asbestos used to be safe... for years.
and then..
not so much
What effects will the vaccine have on people in 2-5 years?
Are you actually willing to get the future boosters? It sounds like there's a lot of them planned.
which is why I'm happy letting them go through years of testing.Been true for a lot of things.
You posted 39 minutes ago. Unclench. Especially funny since I asked you a real question before that, you ignored it, and then posted about disappearing. You won't do even a basic amount of research because you choose to remain ignorant because it's easier to stick to your bumper stickers.
Do you know how a vaccine works? Did you even bother to give a cursory glance at the links I posted? Obviously not because you posted way to fast to have read even the synopsis. Again, you are intellectually lazy.
None of this is reassuring. Do you really think it bolsters your argument that the only time the technology was used in humans was in those whose prognosis was "gonna die anyway so why not"?The underlying technology/science has been studied since the 1960s.
Experiments on mammals have been going on since at least 1990.
Experiments using the technology for vaccination on mammals has been going on since at least 1995. See: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7882341/
Use in humans as a cancer treatment has been happening since at least 2009. See: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19609242/
What part of your oath requires posting rebellion fantasies on the internet?You missed the point, again.
It’s not imagination, it’s having principles and following my oath.
You should try it sometime.
When does one know when we've reached that point?What part of your oath requires posting rebellion fantasies on the internet?
Talk is cheap. We haven't reached the point where oaths are tested yet.
It will likely be fairly obvious. And will require more of one's oath than shaking a fist at a computer screen.When does one know when we've reached that point?
That's not an answer.It will likely be fairly obvious. And will require more of one's oath than shaking a fist at a computer screen.
People who take oaths usually know about OPSEC and avoid leading with their chins.That's not an answer.
You must be new here.Just a reminder... which INGO will ignore.
We have a vax thread.
This one is more about the MANDATE.
Now that I've got that off my chest... in come the 300 posts about vax and anti-vaxers.
Should that time arrive, you might need those you're demeaning as keyboard commandos to stand beside you. Might be wise not to constantly **** in their wheaties.People who take oaths usually know about OPSEC and avoid leading with their chins.
His "power as president"I have looked for it, but by what authority is the Administration claiming that they can do this, outside say the service???
This sounds like a line out of Animal Farm or something.It will likely be fairly obvious.
I don't need the help of anyone posting ridiculous blaze-of-glory fantasies on the internet. Real professionals don't do that. Anyone dumb enough to post that **** on the internet, knowing full well that nothing on the internet is truly anonymous to the right people, would likely be a liability in actual volatile situation.Should that time arrive, you might need those you're demeaning as keyboard commandos to stand beside you. Might be wise not to constantly **** in their wheaties.
It was farmers, cobblers, smiths the first go round. They weren't professionals.I don't need the help of anyone posting ridiculous blaze-of-glory fantasies on the internet. Real professionals don't do that. Anyone dumb enough to post that **** on the internet, knowing full well that nothing on the internet is truly anonymous to the right people, would likely be a liability in actual volatile situation.