They lobby for it and when it passes they want to be exempted. Hmmm.
Why not argue for more pay at the existing job? What was minimum wage previously? $7-something? So, if you made double minimum previously, you should be making double minimum ($30/hr) now!So, I'm curious. If I was making $15.00 an hour at another job (presumably with more responsibility, higher technical difficulty etc to justify my higher wage) why wouldn't I go and present my rather impressive resume to McDonalds and get an easier job for the same pay?
Why not argue for more pay at the existing job? What was minimum wage previously? $7-something? So, if you made double minimum previously, you should be making double minimum ($30/hr) now!
So, I'm curious. If I was making $15.00 an hour at another job (presumably with more responsibility, higher technical difficulty etc to justify my higher wage) why wouldn't I go and present my rather impressive resume to McDonalds and get an easier job for the same pay?
For this McDonald's cook, wage hike could be more harm than help - LA Times
And some unintended consequences.
OK- $15 may well not be a living wage. The minimum wage shouldn't be. Just don't give the libs and those who like to tell others what to do with their money- any ideas. They may well agree that $15 isn't enough.
Why not argue for more pay at the existing job? What was minimum wage previously? $7-something? So, if you made double minimum previously, you should be making double minimum ($30/hr) now!
Which succinctly explains why unions advocate for a higher minimum wage even though very, very few, if any, of their members make the minimum wage.
When inflation rears it's ugly head...at the same time as increasing unemployment, which Keynes told us was impossible, but Jimmy Carter learned otherwise, we'll just "solve" that issue with more government intervention. That always works.
See there, this whole thing would be fixed if we'd just go full on socialist. I mean, why shouldn't the government just own McDonald's? Or everything. I mean, we're all in this together, right?
Point of order.
While you didn't say it directly, this alludes to Mr. Carter being the worst president we have ever had. That information is about six years out of date.
That is all.
It refers simply to "stagflation" which was a phenomenon unheard of to Keynesians pre-Carter. We have not yet experiences significant stagflation during the Obama presidency. We have seen increasing unemployment at times, slight employment recoveries and inflation in certain sectors, but not overall increasing unemployment and inflation at the same time....yet. This is not to say that the economy has been all smiles. Far from.
Point of order.
While you didn't say it directly, this alludes to Mr. Carter being the worst president we have ever had. That information is about six years out of date.
That is all.
Is this the new INGO?