CountryBoy19
Grandmaster
Let me counter that with this. How would you feel if your 17 round capacity Glock or whatever it was had some sort of cut-off device right in the middle of the magazine so that every time you got half-way through you had to stop shooting, flip a switch, rack the slide, then resume shooting? "It's still faster than stopping to reload an 8 round capacity gun." Well sure it's faster, but it's stupid because the capacity is there, they just added extra steps for you to "access" that capacity.so what makes it different from any 7 +1 shotgun. you hear the click on them and then half to reload completely. it doesn't matter if there is another tube or not unless i guess you can successfully count rounds out of regular shotgun better during SD situation? but instead of loading from your side saddle you just switch it over and charlie mike. i am sorry i just don't see your point at all it doesn't matter if its a shotgun or pistol if your not counting rounds when you pull the trigger you going to hear that click and half to reload so there is no real difference in your scenario.
i keep a 870 for home defense w/ a side shell holder that holds 6, so pretty close to what the keltec is holding but instead of having to pull the shells out on empty and then reload, i just switch tubes and roll definitely seems like it will shave a good amount of time on it.
It just seems totally asinine doesn't it? To include all that mag capacity and then make it cut off half-way through it?
It would be very simple for keltec to make this switch automatically, but they didn't. I just think it's silly not to do it. Like I said, I can see his point that it is still faster than a reload, but wouldn't you want to just not have to worry about it at all?
And are you seriously saying you don't understand my scenario at all? About thinking you've got plenty of ammo left, but the critical shot in a gun-fight just happens to be the one where you were supposed to switch over to the other tube?