Kamala Harris LIED AGAIN: She's Coming for Your Guns via an 'Assault Weapons' Ban

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • eric001

    Vaguely well-known member
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Apr 3, 2011
    1,912
    149
    Indianapolis
    Harris claims she wants 'mandatory buy backs' (confiscation).
    Then claims she doesn't want to take anybody's guns.


    Those are mutually exclusive statements.
    They can not both simultaneously exist.

    And do you actually think she's smart enough to notice that, or even remotely honest enough to care?

    I've had gum stuck to my shoe that was smarter than her. And she's about as honest as a dog's hind leg is straight.

    Democrats who will vote for her no matter what are about on par with the gum though.
     

    BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    20,827
    149
    1,000 yards out

    Amishman44

    Master
    Rating - 98.2%
    54   1   0
    Dec 30, 2009
    3,891
    113
    Woodburn
    The woman has been a complete failure in every step of her life. She failed her bar exam and yet was installed as DA. There are still court cases filed to correct things she blatantly and dishonestly screwed up there.
    Then she was installed as Senator. Her performance was so dismal, when it came time for the presidential primary, she could not put 1% in her own state. Yet she was installed as VP.
    After years of telling us Joe Biden Is sharp as a tack, the installers put her in as presidential candidate without even having a primary, even though Joe is still alive and legally the president. She has been installed every step of the way, and she was installed in the White House like a toilet flange in a public washroom. As much as an enemy of the Constitution as she is, she is only the tip of the iceberg.
    Figure out who is installing her and you will find the real devil.

    Bingo...that's thinkin' below the surface! She does continue to be 'installed' in spite of her failures (her dismal performances doesn't begin to cover it) and, the sad part is, the people continue to 'buy into' all the rhetoric / deception(s)! She lied through the entire debate. Her ads lie to the American people trying sway voters with words, in spite of their (her) actions.
    And the list goes on...
     
    Last edited:

    Amishman44

    Master
    Rating - 98.2%
    54   1   0
    Dec 30, 2009
    3,891
    113
    Woodburn


    A 'buy-back' program...for 'assault' weapons? So, basically, any weapon that's ever been used in an assault of someone?
    Question: If the police caught the perpetrator(s), don't they already have most of those weapons in the evidence locker? (sarcasm)
    I don't own any 'assault' weapons as mine have always been used respectfully and responsibly... and, in a self-defense scenario, that's not 'assault' by definition, it's called 'self-defense' which is allowable under the law!
     
    Last edited:

    BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    20,827
    149
    1,000 yards out

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    33,198
    77
    Camby area
    Harris claims she wants 'mandatory buy backs' (confiscation).
    Then claims she doesn't want to take anybody's guns.


    Those are mutually exclusive statements.
    They can not both simultaneously exist.
    In her mind, she isnt TAKING anyones guns. They are going to exchange the guns for money, so its not TAKING. It is BUYING.
     

    carry205

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 6, 2017
    101
    43
    Florissant



    GTHK
    This blurb showed up on another gun blog I am a member of. She said this in 2007, but guess what…it’s still relative. She wanted to to violate the 4th amendment to enforce an illegal action against the 2nd amendment. If by chance she’s “elected”, how long will she wait to start this violation? The freaking democrats better wake up. She is nothing but a wolf in sheep’s clothing, and she has already dropped her disguise, and is at their door. Be watchful, ladies and gentlemen.
     
    Top Bottom