Kamala Harris for president 2024

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,258
    113
    Gtown-ish
    I agree to an extent. But when one throws around words like racist, misogynistic, and rarely used big words like sesquipedalian. That did nothing but intimidate many when used the way it was. I have a major problem with it. The diversity that we use to celebrate in this country was that people can have different opinions. But I will be d@mnned if I will let someone bully their opinion on me or my family using bigoted name calling. It's my opinion that there was a line crossed with that posters methods. Now if he tried a different method, than there might have been some common ground that could've been found. Or at least a mutual respect.
    Judging from the way people lined up to give they/them their opinions, I don’t think anyone was intimidated by more than tempering their replies to stay within forum rules.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: oze

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,258
    113
    Gtown-ish
    I love when someone is making an online argument, then uses a thesaurus to throw out a big word no one knows or uses, as if they now have the upper hand from the usage of said big word. Oh no…. They just showed me how dumb I am by using a large word they must frequently use in their vocabulary…
    I remembered what it meant. Someone called me that once. Might have been on INGO.
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,944
    77
    Porter County
    Well I did say primary so I'm not talking about the time before.
    Huh? Every candidate before the primaries ran for President having never received a primary vote, starting with Washington.

    And there is no law that says anything about how parties pick their candidates. The Constitution is silent about it too. Of course there were no parties when they wrote it, so it wouldn't.


    The only candidate in the history of the United States that never received one primary vote to be able to run for president.
    How is that even lawful?
     

    DadSmith

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Oct 21, 2018
    25,927
    113
    Ripley County
    Huh? Every candidate before the primaries ran for President having never received a primary vote, starting with Washington.

    And there is no law that says anything about how parties pick their candidates. The Constitution is silent about it too. Of course there were no parties when they wrote it, so it wouldn't.
    Primaries were established in the early 1900's because parties picked candidates the people didn't like. So they changed it to give people a say.
    I thought it was rule of law. I stand corrected.
     

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    530,606
    Messages
    9,954,525
    Members
    54,893
    Latest member
    Michael.
    Top Bottom