It was like a "war zone" in Wisconsin: SWAT vs. "Survivalist"

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • techres

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Industry Partner
    Rating - 100%
    27   0   0
    Mar 14, 2008
    6,479
    38
    1
    A SWAT account of a long gun battle and arrest of a "survivalist". I was not sure which forum to put this in as for some it would belong in politics, and other would say tactics, so I figured this was the most neutral choice.

    Anyways:

    It was like a "war zone" in Wisconsin

    It was like a "war zone" in Wisconsin

    SWAT Officer
    with Lt. Dan Marcou

    Editor’s note: One year ago today in a rural part of Wisconsin, Richland County Sheriff Darrel Berglin and his Special Response Team were manning the perimeter around a house in which a self-proclaimed survivalist named Robert Bayliss was holed up and heavily armed. In Lt. Dan Marcou’s excellent account below, we’re reminded of the professionalism and preparedness demonstrated by police across the country every single day. If you’ve got a story you’d like to share, please let us know by sending us an E-Mail. If you don’t want to write it in your own “First Person" voice, then one of PoliceOne’s columnists can tell the tale in your stead.

    One of the officers at the scene in Richland County, Wisconsin said it was “like a war zone.” The scene was reminiscent of the SLA shootout in Los Angeles, except this gun battle took place around the crest of a hill, on the wooded, junk-littered property of a self-proclaimed survivalist named Robert C. Bayliss.

    It all started during the afternoon of March 31, 2008 when several Richland County Deputies approached Bayliss’s enclave to serve civil process on him. They had tried many times since January to serve the process, without success. Bayliss was being evicted from his property for failing to pay taxes since 2000. The deputies maneuvered cautiously through the 18-acre property toward the home, which held a commanding view of the area from its location on the crest of a hill.

    Suddenly the silence of the woods was shattered by 15 rounds from a high powered rifle. The deputies took cover and immediately called the in the situation, triggering a three-day stand-off.

    Containment

    Richland County Sheriff Darrel Berglin responded to the scene along with the Richland County Special Response Team. Due to the size of the property and the tactically superior position of the home, a painstaking effort was taken to establish a command post and achieve containment. Negotiators continually attempted to contact Bayliss with no indication that he was even slightly willing to negotiate.

    On April 3, 2008 at 9:00 AM an attempt was made to approach the house by the Richland County Team and the Vernon County Sheriff’s Department Special Response Team, utilizing their Bear Cat (Ballistic Engineered Armored Response Counter-Attack Truck). As the team approached the house, Bayliss opened fire again, striking the sides and windshield of the Bear Cat. The windshield held, but the decision was made to disengage.

    Mutual Aid

    Throughout the day, negotiators continued to use voice-projecting equipment in their attempts with to convince Bayliss to surrender. The attempts proved futile. Sheriff Berglin then requested assistance and received an immediate response from the Dane County Tactical Response Team, The Eau Claire County SWAT Team, the La Crosse County Emergency Response Team, The Sauk County Emergency Response Team. These groups joined Vernon and Richland already on scene.

    A chain of command was established and the tactical team leaders formulated a plan. The additional teams allowed for a rotation of the counter-sniper teams. Intelligence gathered on the perimeter suggested that Bayliss’ possessed incendiary devices and home-made explosive devices.

    In addition to the teams mentioned above, Richland County had requested and received assistance from Wisconsin Department of Criminal Investigation, The Dane County Bomb Squad, The Wisconsin Fire Marshall, Kenosha Air One, The Wisconsin State Patrol Fixed Wing Aircraft, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Viola Fire, and Viola Emergency Medical Services.

    A plan was devised to end this deadly encounter.

    The Battle is Joined

    At 4:52 PM three Bear Cats in a formation began an approach the house, enabling team members to concentrate their fire power forward. Bayliss instantly opened fire on the teams, firing from the upper windows of the home, moving from window to window as if they were gun ports. Bayliss concentrated his fire on the Bear Cats, containing the teams. His fire was extremely accurate, but the Bear Cats did what they were designed to do. They protected the teams.

    Both counter-sniper teams fired back at the ducking and moving suspect, but Bayliss had fortified his home for this battle. The house had been reinforced in spots with steel plating, which protected the suspect and were found later pock marked by police hits. All of the Bear Cats were hit, but the assault continued forward in the face of this relentless fire. The gunfire was general now as Bayliss began to lob home made explosives out of the upper windows of his home. Some 50 rounds of non-burning chemical munitions were fired back into the Bayliss compound.

    For 12 minutes—what seemed like and “eternity” to the tactical officers on scene—there was a continuous exchange of gunfire. One officer at the scene said “I was trying to keep the suspect’s head down by shooting where I thought he was. If I could keep his head down I thought he could not shoot at the teams.” Bayliss would appear take a shot, then quickly disappear and move. Surrender was clearly not on his agenda.

    The Fire

    As the arrest teams closed in, it is suspected that Bayliss either accidentally or deliberately set his house alight with one of his incendiary bombs. As the fire quickly spread there were a series of explosions inside the fortress. Fire Departments had been on stand by, but they could not approach, because of the extreme danger posed by Bayliss, his burning ammunition and his improvised explosive devices.

    Tactical Team Members called for Bayliss to surrender, warning him that he would die inside the house if he did not come out. When it seemed to be over for Bayliss, he appeared exiting an upstairs window and began to climb down a makeshift ladder. His sweatshirt shifted, revealing a pistol in a holster on his right hip.

    One officer warned the rest, “He’s got gun on his hip!”

    Another officer cautioned the others, “Look out boys he’s going to hit the ground shooting.”

    A chorus rang out “Drop the gun!” followed by a solo voice singing clearly, “Less Lethal! Less Lethal! Less Lethal!”

    The distinctive pop of less lethal rounds replaced the still echoing gun fire and Bayliss reacted to a double-shot to the thigh. He stopped on the ladder and for the first time in three days he was communicating, and at long last listening. Using his finger tips he removed the pistol from his holster and threw it to the ground. Robert Bayliss was ordered down the ladder and to the ground and after a minor bit of physical resistance was over come he was handcuffed. It was over.

    The Aftermath

    At his trial, Bayliss conducted his own defense and even though he did not belong to any particular group, he possessed views that questioned governmental “sovereignty.” He felt that after posting his property and giving warning, anyone on his property was “trespassing.”

    The jury didn’t buy his defense and after eight hours of deliberation, on February 10, 2009 found Robert Bayliss guilty on 13 of the 17 charges lodged against him, including being found guilty of four counts of Attempted First Degree Intentional Homicide. He will be sentenced after a pre-sentence investigation.

    His property, minus the home which burned to the ground, was sold at auction for $35,000 to make up for his back taxes.

    Robert Bayliss had more than 90 weapons in his home and fired more than 200 rounds from his favorite, a 300 Winchester Magnum. He threw in excess of 30 incendiary grenades at the officers. Officers returned fire with approximately 150 rounds and 50 chemical munitions along with the less lethal rounds that inspired Bayliss’ final capitulation.

    Recognition

    Local media in all jurisdiction involved had universally questioned the acquisition of Bear Cats, which were strategically placed recently around Wisconsin by Homeland Security. After the Bayliss battle, local media begrudgingly agreed that lives were protected by these vehicles, which seemed to arrive from Homeland Security minus the blare of the bugle like the cavalry of old “in the nick of time.”

    The Association of SWAT Personnel of Wisconsin, which every year recognizes a SWAT Officer of the Year and a SWAT Team of the Year, gave unprecedented recognition for this unprecedented incident. The 2008 SWAT Team of the Year Award went out to six separate SWAT Teams for their extraordinary coordinated response to this extraordinary circumstance. They are:

    The DANE County Tactical Response Team
    The Eau Claire County SWAT Team
    The La Crosse County Emergency Response Team
    The Richland County Special Response Team
    The Sauk County Emergency Response Team
    The Vernon County Combined Tactical Unit

    Rodney Stearns, who is a member of the Eau Claire County SWAT Team had this to say about this incredible experience:

    “It was a battle that can not be explained with an end result that carries that same amazement. This was one of those tactical missions that relied heavily on proper planning and preparation and the end result was a direct reflection of both.”

    To all of those officers who faced the ferocious fire of a man bent on killing, and who ultimately thwarted the suspect through superior tactics, equipment, and professionalism above and beyond the call of duty, PoliceOne salutes your courage.

    Dan Marcou retired as a highly decorated police lieutenant and SWAT Commander with 33 as a police officer. He is a nationally recognized police trainer in many police disciplines and is a Master Trainer in the State of Wisconsin. He has authored two novels The Calling: The Making of a Veteran Cop and S.W.A.T. Blue Knights in Black Armor available at Barnes and Noble and Amazon.com.

    Visit his website.

    There are comments that follow at the site.
     

    Rlee

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    May 14, 2008
    441
    16
    New Castle, IN
    And that was only one man against trained professionals. I believe that the american people have hope if they wish to fight if and when the time ever comes.
     

    HICKMAN

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Jan 10, 2009
    16,762
    48
    Lawrence Co.
    Why is it we continue to pay taxes on our houses, even after they are paid off?

    Why do we pay taxes on land we "own"?....

    Founding Fathers look down in shame...
     

    techres

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Industry Partner
    Rating - 100%
    27   0   0
    Mar 14, 2008
    6,479
    38
    1
    Why is it we continue to pay taxes on our houses, even after they are paid off?

    Why do we pay taxes on land we "own"?....

    Founding Fathers look down in shame...

    One of the comments on the page asked the same thing:

    Being a cop and a former SWAT officer myself, I have mixed feelings about this event. These officers did what they were ordered to do, and they fought well...it's hard to blame them for that. But, let us examine why SWAT was there to begin with. A man was going to be evicted from his own home...for what? Back taxes? For not paying the government their land rent?...on a home he owned! Do we have property rights anymore? I'm sorry...but if an officer had been killed over this...could you justify it? To collect back taxes? Doesn't seem worth my partner's life.
     

    Jack Ryan

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 2, 2008
    5,864
    36
    Why is it we continue to pay taxes on our houses, even after they are paid off?

    Why do we pay taxes on land we "own"?....

    Founding Fathers look down in shame...

    Because our rulers consider the people to be a commodity to be taken advantage of and put to best use by the ruler of the country. You are no longer citizens, you are property of your government rulers.

    Property can't own property. A cow or mule can't own property. You are allowed use of what your owner see's fit to allow you to use so that he may get the country's best use out of you.
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    10,071
    149
    Indiana
    I was curious as to what a Bear Cat was and found this.
    2uq1ymd.jpg

    There are a few states with no property taxes,but most like our we just rent the land.Very sad state of affairs when a person works all there life to pay off a home but never really owns anything.
     

    mikea46996

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 28, 2009
    1,750
    38
    Winamac
    Because our rulers consider the people to be a commodity to be taken advantage of and put to best use by the ruler of the country. You are no longer citizens, you are property of your government rulers.

    Property can't own property. A cow or mule can't own property. You are allowed use of what your owner see's fit to allow you to use so that he may get the country's best use out of you.

    :+1:Wow jack I for once fully agree with your statement.. Words of wisdom there.
     

    Chefcook

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Oct 20, 2008
    4,163
    36
    Raccoon City
    Because our rulers consider the people to be a commodity to be taken advantage of and put to best use by the ruler of the country. You are no longer citizens, you are property of your government rulers.

    Property can't own property. A cow or mule can't own property. You are allowed use of what your owner see's fit to allow you to use so that he may get the country's best use out of you.


    I'm runnin outa cupie dolls Jack. It wont let me rep you...:D
     

    jeremy

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Feb 18, 2008
    16,482
    36
    Fiddler's Green
    Hell while you are all stirred up on property taxes. How about inheritance taxes, how many times does a family have to pay for its property?
     

    cordex

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jun 24, 2008
    818
    18
    jeremy said:
    Hell while you are all stirred up on property taxes. How about inheritance taxes, how many times does a family have to pay for its property?
    As many times as it takes to get it all.
     

    Colt556

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    65   0   0
    Feb 12, 2009
    8,998
    113
    Avon
    "It was like a war zone", "Suddenly the silence was broken by 15 rounds of high power rifle fire", "A plan was devised to end this deadly encounter", "For 12 minutes- what seemed like an eternity", "it is suspected that Bayliss either accidentally or intentionally set his house alight". I could quote more but it seemed as if the writer was trying his hand at novel writing instead of presenting the facts. It was one man against at least 6 SWAT teams, 3 armored vehicles and countless other LE personel. He fired 200 rounds from a bolt action rifle and the cops fired 150 rounds plus smoke, teargas and non lethal rounds. The "over 90 weapons" must have been crappy or they would have focused on some of them instead of "his favorite, a .300 Winchester Magnum". All this to evict a man from his own property for back taxes. Nobody was hurt in this "Deadly encounter" and they probably spent more to evict him than he owed. The writer was so busy patting the LE on their backs and sensationalizing the story to talk about the main points. We have no true freedom here. We are free to do a great many things and I love this country more than anything, but nothing is really free. We have to pay for everything over and over and over again. Our homes, property, vehicles and even our own money is taxed by the government. Now the "Death Tax" is on it's way. Why must we pay taxes on personal property? Oh well, not meaning to get off on a tangent and by no means want to demean the LE world. I suppose just the dramatic way the story was written about the taking of one man who was willling to fight for his beliefs by an army of cops bothers me. Puttin flame suit on now...
     

    Paco Bedejo

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 23, 2009
    1,672
    38
    Fort Wayne
    Do you notice that these always end with "they set their own compound on fire"

    I like how the article specifically stated that the chemical rounds were non-incendiary... Sometimes it feels like "kill it with fire" is the standard response, along with "tell them HE started it".
     

    zimzum

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 15, 2008
    182
    16
    Chesterfield
    As the arrest teams closed in, it is suspected that Bayliss either accidentally or deliberately set his house alight with one of his incendiary bombs. As the fire quickly spread there were a series of explosions inside the fortress. Fire Departments had been on stand by, but they could not approach, because of the extreme danger posed by Bayliss, his burning ammunition and his improvised explosive devices.

    Sounds familiar.
     

    Go Devil

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Jan 10, 2009
    254
    18
    Fishers, IN
    Why did this isolated conflict transpire?

    Taxes.

    Why did this "Survivalist" engagement fail?

    He was alone.

    Who financed the termination of his beliefs.

    We did.

    We are the enemy gentlemen.

    We, collectively, provide the funding for further infringement of our liberties.

    If we want to stop what we are seeing happen politically in our country, we must, as a united people, stop paying the bill.
     
    Top Bottom