Of course you think so. You're the one who made the following comment:
Having a different opinion, in a conversation discussing Wendy's being burned for the manager simply doing the right thing, does not constitute being in favor of a totalitarian government.
That was uncalled-for. Man-up and accept that you got a little hot under the collar. It happens.
It’s clear that the officer knew who's taser it was. There’s 90 minutes of body cam video released to the public. After the shooting the cop who shot Brooks told some other officers involved in the investigation that Brooks took the other cop’s taser.
Be careful about wording wild ass binary statements. It is a sign that you may have said something that’s at least a little full of ****. There’s a lot of room between not listening to the complaints and favoring a totalitarian government.The beatings will continue until morale improves.
If you think that is the solution, you either aren't listening to the complaints or you are in favor of a totalitarian government.
Do you have a link to that video?
No, I'm not hot under the collar.
There are nationwide protests of police violence against a person who was not resisting. If you think the proper response is police violence against protesters a la the clearing of Lafayette Square, then you're not listing to the complaints.
Open for business.
Stay on topic please.
No matter if pre-planned or not. There is no legitimate excuse for this lack of social responsibility or the lack of spine of the government to squelch it!!!!
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
If you think that is the solution, you either aren't listening to the complaints or you are in favor of a totalitarian government.
I'm OK with whatever level of lethality you want the taser to count as so long as it's consistent no matter who is holding the taser.
Is a taser lethal? Then there was no justification for the officer to use it.
Is it non-lethal? Then there was no justification for the suspect to be shot.
No, I'm not hot under the collar.
There are nationwide protests of police violence against a person who was not resisting. If you think the proper response is police violence against protesters a la the clearing of Lafayette Square, then you're not listing to the complaints.
We can all play the conflate(for Alpo) unrelated events game
If you think burning St Johns church is a proper response to grievances, then you're not listening to the other side of the debate or worse yet are convinced of the absolute recht of your viewpoint
Is not tying together protests against police violence against a non-resisting (at the time) perp and the clearing of Lafayette square the epitome of conflation? From the OED
conflate
verb [ T ]
to combine two or more separate things, especially pieces of text, to form a whole:
Synonyms: combine fuse meld merge
CHAZ has mutated into CHOP.
And they themselves are saying it is like the French revolution.
Reminds me more all the time of Dance The Eagle To Sleep.
chop chop
https://www.trunews.com/stream/christian-free-chaz-jacobins-assault-seattle-preacher
Well, the one thing to come out of the French Revolution that we might be able to look forward to: End of tabloid journalism and press shaming.