Our Executive is a weak-willed ***** who would let the Iranians do whatever they want anyhow, so that leaves it to our military to maintain peace through superior firepower.
Yeah, I don't believe that one sec. I have the upmost confidence that if he had the popular support, he would've invaded both Libya and Syria.
Oh, I agree. There's nothing he would love to do more than to arm al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.
One wonders what the Iranians have in mind for a purpose in doing so, but the other side of the coin is that if all the INGO people who also own boats got together, they would probably have a better navy than Iran.
He does have a gift for jumping in on the wrong side, doesn't he?
Yeah, but then we'd run into problems with the command structure and organization. We can't even keep a thread on track for more than fifty posts, so I imagine we would have run half our fleet aground within the first two hours.
What, and risk losing all our guns in a horrible [STRIKE]boating[/STRIKE] naval accident??One wonders what the Iranians have in mind for a purpose in doing so, but the other side of the coin is that if all the INGO people who also own boats got together, they would probably have a better navy than Iran.
and still have twice the navy.
"Near" Americans waters, not "in." Not that it really makes a difference. Iran is entitled to the use of international waters as anyone else.
What, and risk losing all our guns in a horrible [STRIKE]boating[/STRIKE] naval accident??
A "projection of power"....let that sink in for a moment.The fleet, consisting of a destroyer and a helicopter-carrying supply ship, began its voyage last month from the southern Iranian port city of Bandar Abbas.