IRANIAN WARSHIPS TO BE DEPLOYED TO ATLANTIC (AMERICAN) WATERS

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    "Near" Americans waters, not "in." Not that it really makes a difference. Iran is entitled to the use of international waters as anyone else.
     

    HeadlessRoland

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Aug 8, 2011
    3,521
    63
    In the dark
    Our Executive is a weak-willed ***** who would let the Iranians do whatever they want anyhow, so that leaves it to our military to maintain peace through superior firepower.
     

    eric001

    Vaguely well-known member
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Apr 3, 2011
    1,920
    149
    Indianapolis
    I just had to laugh at the term "fleet" for a destroyer and one other ship. Then SEIndSAM made it an injury to the insult by pointing out how a carrier "group" is ranked. Lots of fun there!!!
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    Our Executive is a weak-willed ***** who would let the Iranians do whatever they want anyhow, so that leaves it to our military to maintain peace through superior firepower.

    Yeah, I don't believe that one sec. I have the upmost confidence that if he had the popular support, he would've invaded both Libya and Syria.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    One wonders what the Iranians have in mind for a purpose in doing so, but the other side of the coin is that if all the INGO people who also own boats got together, they would probably have a better navy than Iran.
     

    HeadlessRoland

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Aug 8, 2011
    3,521
    63
    In the dark
    One wonders what the Iranians have in mind for a purpose in doing so, but the other side of the coin is that if all the INGO people who also own boats got together, they would probably have a better navy than Iran.

    Yeah, but then we'd run into problems with the command structure and organization. We can't even keep a thread on track for more than fifty posts, so I imagine we would have run half our fleet aground within the first two hours.
     

    DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    112,526
    149
    Southside Indy
    One wonders what the Iranians have in mind for a purpose in doing so, but the other side of the coin is that if all the INGO people who also own boats got together, they would probably have a better navy than Iran.
    What, and risk losing all our guns in a horrible [STRIKE]boating[/STRIKE] naval accident??
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    52,112
    113
    Mitchell
    The fleet, consisting of a destroyer and a helicopter-carrying supply ship, began its voyage last month from the southern Iranian port city of Bandar Abbas.
    A "projection of power"....let that sink in for a moment.
     

    DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    112,526
    149
    Southside Indy
    I found a picture of 3 of Iran's rear admirals...

    iranian-navy-taunting-us-navy.jpg
     
    Top Bottom