So, let me see if I understand this:
I am to unite around "your guy" because he's the only who can beat the "evil one" and vanquish darkness - based on phone calls to less than 1/10th of 1 percent of the likely primary voters in this state.
Or, I can exercise my natural rights, and the rights imparted by our Constitution, and cast my vote for whomever I feel will best serve my State and my Republic.
Can you honestly say that Behney agrees with you on every. single. possible. point. of law that might possibly cross his desk were he to win the senate seat?
If not, then you are compromising and calls to "not compromise" are hypocritical.
If so, then can you honestly say that you expect the same to be true of enough voters to beat not only those who have the same degree of agreement with other candidates but those who are willing to compromise?
If not, then how can you possibly expect to win except by hypocritically getting other people to compromise for your candidate.
If your answer is "yes" to both then I can only say that you must be incredibly naive.
Now, here's the thing. I do intend to vote for the candidate I believe will best serve the Republic. But the republic is not served by a candidate who cannot win. You can complain about the number of people polled, but Rassmussen has been quite accurate with that small number polled repeatedly. Trying to pretend otherwise is simply wishful thinking.