Having had the pleasure of doing my duty, sitting on 5 (count em 5) criminal juries. I have noticed that every time a lawyer (srate or defense) tried to bring up a witness' or defendant's past we were instructed to disregard that portion of testimony.
You don't have to start off looking something to find it; I would wager that a lot of felony arrests start out as traffic violations where someone gets stupid.
For the seatbelt solely? Even when the seatbelt law states categoricly that they can't?For what? If they saw her without a seatbelt (which she admitted) they can stop her.
For the seatbelt solely? Even when the seatbelt law states categoricly that they can't?
For the seatbelt solely? Even when the seatbelt law states categoricly that they can't?
cops can stop you based solely on no seatbelt.
The one playing with the halligan.
Reasonable reason for carrying a halligan? Serve warrants.
This is probably the most factual statement that I've seen on his website to date.
Read a recent version of Indiana Code sec. 9-19-10-3.1(a) then get back to me.
Yes they can. Ask me how I know.
Over under on the phrase "Stop resisting!" being used when churchmouse tells us how he knows====> 4
Over under on the phrase "Stop resisting!" being used when churchmouse tells us how he knows====> 4
Lake. Just last month I was seated as the second alternate, but, I asked to approach the bench and gave the judge three reasons I didn't believe I shouldn't serve and both attorneys released me. The can't call me for two years.