In light of - Hypocrisy

[5.56'aholic]

I don't care what colour my neighbours are, so long as they are nice people.

Agreed! I like all of my neighbors, and we are a mix of white, hispanic, black, and asian. Everyone waves and we all look out for one another. The only issues that have ever come to light is from people who do not live here that are up to no good breaking the law.

 

[public servant]

NHV,

Will you do me a favor and explain the difference to me between White Nationalists, the KKK and Skinheads?

You'll have to forgive me because I'm ignorant as to the differences. Until yesterday...I didn't even know White Nationalists existed.

Thanks in advance.

 

[IndyMonkey]

White nationalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ku Klux Klan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Skinhead - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So what do you think of his reply to you about the quotes that you took from SF?

 

[public servant]

White nationalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ku Klux Klan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Skinhead - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So what do you think of his reply to you about the quotes that you took from SF?

No...I meant his explanation. I could have looked it up.

I'd rather know *his* explanation of the differences. Sorry...I always assume other people know what I mean. I should have been more specific.

What do I think of his replies? I'm not sure. He's either...
(1) blowing smoke or
(2) since he refers to the quotes as "that crap" is it like when a bunch of guys get together to drink and the all tell "big fish stories" and B.S. each other to see who is the better man?

If that's the case...then I see it as dangerous.

What I'd like to know...is does he want to be disassociated and separated from all blacks, Jews and other non-whites...or just those he sees as a threat to whites.

I'd like to think that he understands that there are blacks, Jews and other non-whites that are intelligent, educated and non-threatening individuals....just as there are lazy, stupid and dangerous whites in the world that leech off welfare and the government teat.

If he wants to be separated from them all....to what extent is his group willing to go to assure that separation to preserve their white heritage?

 

[NordicHeathenVinlander]

NHV,

Will you do me a favor and explain the difference to me between White Nationalists, the KKK and Skinheads?

You'll have to forgive me because I'm ignorant as to the differences. Until yesterday...I didn't even know White Nationalists existed.

Thanks in advance.

Yes, Brother I can try. Please allow me to use referrances to help make an explaination.

You question is interesting, and yes, I wonder about it, too.

The KKK, was and is an American Traditional Christian organization. Originally created to combat the North's aggressive actions against the south. It was soon disbanned after it's creation when the Union sent an Army to crush it down.

The Ku Klux Klan, has died and been reborn many times since then.
The KKK has traditionally been anti-homosexuality, Traditional Christianity (Not to be confused with Judeo-Christianity), they held the beliefs that the White race was superior to all others races.
They were anti-Multiculturalism, anti-diversity and mainly made up by the loaded term "AngloSaxon Americans". They never supported desegregation. They are Anti-immigration, Anti-Socialist/communism.

The prevelance of the Klan has died down


The Skinhead movement, I believe was originally founded in the UK, labor union, I believe.
Young adults tend to gravitate to these organizations, because of the heavy metal/black metal appeal, and it's underground 'appeal' of being outlaws or few amongst many.
Where they differ from the Klan is in the Traditionalism.

Skinheads, being youth, rebelled against they're Parents, which also includes The home. Most Skinheads would probably best be described as "Anti-Christian" Athiest, or even Germanic Pagans, Celtic Pagans, Slavic Pagans, Vedic (Hindu) Pagan, even Church of Creator or "Creators" Agnosticism is prevelent as is Dieism.
The main beliefs are simply to be "Superior" and "Jews are the root of all evil.".
This movement has long died out, with the spike in the late 80s early to mid 90's.

White nationalism is a political ideology which advocates a racial definition of national identity for white people, and a separate all-white nation state.

Think Isreal, Japan etc...

A problem that is occuring, in America, Europe, Canada, South Africa and Austerilia is that, there is a flood of Latinos, Arabic Muslims, Africans, going into JUST WHITE Nations, the record number is unbelievable.

Which in of itself is not the taboo; None of the immigrants wish to assimilate, they agendas to take over, and subvert Western or European identity.

We see it here in America, with Latinos.

The vast majority of white nationalists are separatists, and only a smaller number are supremacists.

Alot of what could be considered "Supremacism" is not. But facts.
It's not supremacism to say Blacks are better at sports, but it is supremacism to say Whites are more intelligent, nevermind, WN will readily admit on those same IQ scores Asians score higher.

While ofcourse, each will have they're opinion on those issues.

Supremacism has historically, since WWII been a term to describe anything which is remotely Pro-White.

The founding Fathers of America are called Supremacist, racist, evil, bigots.

According to Samuel P. Huntington, the contemporary white nationalist movement is increasingly cultured, intellectual and academically trained..

Some have suggested that rather than espousing violence, White Nationalists use statistics and social science data to argue for a self-conscious white identity.

By challenging established policy on immigration, civil rights and racial integration, they seek to build bridges with moderately conservative white citizens

When David Duke ran for office in LA, he won, against a Democrat. The poll later taken was that those who voted for Dr. Duke were college educated, professionally employeed, while his opponent, who played up the common lowest dominator's supporter made up the unintellectiual, HS drop out, or those who never earned a college degree, nor did they hold a professional career.

White Nationalist, are found at all levels of various jobs, in ALL fields.
One simple fact of life is, White Nationalist have much in common with the General Conservative base, infact many beliefs interlock.

White nationalists argue that every nationality feels a natural affection for its own kind.[7] Many white nationalists consider themselves patriotic preservers of European history and culture. They stand for racial self-preservation and claim that culture itself is a product of race.[4] White nationalists argue that a natural hierarchy should triumph over the "false promise of egalitarianism"[8] and that the downfall of white dominance spells doom for representative government, the rule of law and freedom of speech

Again, we can observe Isreal as the best example, Jewish Nationalism.

And South Africa as the example of what happens when Whites loose control of THEY'RE NATION.

According to white nationalist Samuel T. Francis, it is "a movement that rejects equality as an ideal and insists on an enduring core of human nature transmitted by heredity."[8] Jared Taylor, another notable white nationalist, claims that similar racial views were held by many mainstream American leaders before the 1950s.[8].

According to Huntington, white nationalists argue that the demographic shift in the US towards non-whites brings a new culture that is intellectually and morally inferior.[4]

They argue that with this demographic shift comes affirmative action, immigrant ghettos and declining educational standards.[5]

Most American white nationalists say immigration should be restricted to selected people of European ancestry.

Equality, has become a political punchline to practice Anti-White agenda as explained in depth in the following video.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_3SHsMY76E"]YouTube - Civil Rights for White People?[/ame]

White Nationalism FAQ

Q. What is White Nationalism?​

A. The idea that Whites may need to create a separate nation as a means of defending themselves.​

Q. Do White Nationalists feel they are superior to other races?
A. No. The desire of White Nationalists to form their own nation has nothing to do with superiority or inferiority.
Q. Do White Nationalists seek to dominate other races?
A. Not at all. In fact, formation of a White nation removes any possibility of White dominance of other races, as well as the plausibility of the accusation that Whites wish to dominate others.
Q. Do White Nationalists seek to insulate themselves from competition from other races?
A. No. A separate White nation would establish a policy of free trade with its new neighbors. Labor markets are global, and the formation of a White nation would not protect Whites from economic competition.
Q. Well if White Nationalists don't feel superior, don't want to dominate others, and don't seek protection from competition, then why would they want a separate nation?
A. To avoid exploitation.
Q. Exploitation? This is rich! So how is it that Whites are exploited?
A. It is a long list. Burdensome racial preference schemes in hiring, racial preference schemes in university admissions, racial preference schemes in government contracting and small business loans. Beyond quotas there is the denial of rights of free speech and of due process to Whites who are critical of these governmental policies. We have special punishments for assaults committed by Whites if the motives might be racial. In addition, Whites pay a proportion of the costs of the welfare state that is disproportionate to what they receive in benefits.
But the most exploitative aspect of the situation is that neither the racial quotas, the business preferences, the loss of freedom of speech, nor the disproportionate contributions to the welfare state have managed to sate the appetites of non-Whites living in the United States.
The more Whites sacrifice, the more non-Whites demand. Many Whites are beginning to believe that no amount of tribute, other than mass suicide, would satisfy the non-White demands.
If our presence stirs up that much hatred in the hearts of non-Whites, then the only sensible course of action is to separate ourselves from them.
Q. You claim that non-Whites are the aggressors and haters in race relations. Aren't you afraid that most Whites will think this is ridiculous?
A. Not in the slightest. For the past 30 years most Whites have taken part in a mass migration or "White flight" away from neighborhoods inhabited by non-Whites. Aggressors don't flee. For example, on a per-capita basis, Blacks are 49 times more likely to assault a White than a White is to assault a Black. Assaults by Whites against Blacks are approximately 40 times scarcer than they would be if races were randomly mixed and assault rates did not vary by race. The best measure of racism is the number of non-economically motivated attacks. White score low in this regard, non-Whites high.
The fact is that non-Whites are clamoring to enter this country in droves. Whites are fleeing en masse to formerly uninhabited areas to escape these new arrivals.
Q. But how can Whites be exploited when it is Whites who have enacted these racial preferences, the taxation, the welfare payments and set immigration quotas?
A. Excellent question! It is true that Whites are exploited by their fellow Whites. In fact, we do not expect any resistance by non-Whites to the formation of a separate nation. We expect White integrationist elites to resist. They are the ones who have a great deal to lose.
Q. If life in America is so bad for Whites why don't you just move back to Europe?
A. We are a majority. We do not have to move back. We can resolve to defend ourselves against this onslaught. We have the option of peacefully ceding lands already inhabited by non-Whites to separate non-White nations. We would save money, and could restore our civil liberties and free ourselves from constant threats of violence by so doing.
Q. What would your separate state look like?
A. The truth is we don't know yet. Our separate state would follow the geographic outlines of White flight. The model for this state would be the modern gerrymander created by the Voting Rights Act to create majority non-White congressional districts. We would simply cede these to a separate nation. The mechanics of this process will be explained more fully later in a post entitled "sweating the details."
Q. Would all Whites be welcome in your separate state?
A. Absolutely. There would be no restriction by country of origin, and no genetic tests, skin color or hair color tests or any nonsense like that. The only restriction would be that those who would wish to recreate the present system by importing non-Whites and then encouraging their hostility would not be welcome. They would have to remain in or move to the lands ceded to the non-Whites.
Q. You are proposing that inclusion and exclusion be based on ideology and feelings. Won't your act of nation splitting turn into a witch hunt?
A. For White liberals it is definitely going to feel like a witch hunt! When the time comes, those who are guilty of "integrationism" should do the sensible thing and flee. It will spare us all a lot of pain.
Q. Is this White nation something that you intend to pursue right away?
A. No. The White nation is, by most accounts, about 20 years off. When the rest of the U.S. begins to look like Southern California it will happen more or less automatically, without much of a push from us.
Q. Why do you use the term "European-American?"
A. All Whites are descended from European immigrants, and we are not actually "White." The term European-American has political significance for two reasons. First, it recognizes that most people in the U.S. of European extraction have intermarried to such an extent that it is no longer possible to identify American Whites as "Irish" or "German" or "Italian." But more important, use of the term "European-American" is intended to recognize that White elites in the United States have exploited differences based on religion and European national origin to divide European-Americans, with the intention of rendering us unable to defend ourselves against non-White demands.
Q. What is White separatism?
A White separatists will agree on most points with a White Nationalist, except that he may not see a need to establish a separate nation within the present territorial boundaries of the U.S.
Q. What is a White supremacist?
A. That is a White who wishes to subjugate other races by force, ordinarily by military conquest. White supremacists are very rare in 1997, and there is no visible trend or base of support which would allow them to carry such a political program into effect.

White Nationalist come from ALL religious background, Catholic's, Traditional American Christianity, even some Judeo Christians, Christian Identity (Those who believe that certain Whites were the True Hebrews of the lost tribes), Buddhist, Vedicist (Hindu), Any ethnic European Pagan religion, athiest, agnostic.

Profession's are far and spread, from lawyers, Doctors, police officers, Career Military, etc.

Economically, White Nationalism is diverse, there are poor, middle class (majority) and upper class.

In short, WN was and is intended to be a catch all to end all divisive ideals.

The media demonizing of White Nationalism is properganda. We can use History Channel's "GangLand" as the best example. During the Black/latino Gangland spiff, we see entire groups, committed to breaking laws.

However, Ganglands which featured skinheads or neo nazis, the story was ALWAYS focused on just one individual, but used that one individual as the basis to discredit everything else.

It's a sad fact, that being Pro-White in the media's eyes will earn you zero friends.




Here Racist Rachel Maddow is exposed for her vile hypocrisy.

 

[NordicHeathenVinlander]

I'd like to think that he understands that there are blacks, Jews and other non-whites that are intelligent, educated and non-threatening individuals....just as there are lazy, stupid and dangerous whites in the world that leech off welfare and the government teat.

If he wants to be separated from them all....to what extent is his group willing to go to assure that separation to preserve their white heritage?

Public Servant, I would not desire the task to ever debate that there are no good blacks, jews or other people; aswell concerning Intelligence.

NEVER WOULD I want to take that fight, simply because it's unprovable.

It's like the guys who say "All pit bulls are dangerous". Yes many are, but the one time I had a Pit bull around my one year old daughter, there was never an attack.

And yes, I can whole heartedly agree that there are lazy, criminal, White people - Never said there wasnt.

I go to Anti-immigration rallies, I try to support those whose agenda isnt going to pander to those whose agenda is counter to mine.
I contact my politicians, almost weekly, with complaints, compliments etc.

I try to donate to organizations which favor traditional American values, instead of liberal/socialist/communist agendas.

I look to 2012 as hopes for the future. I attend Tea party rallies, I try to be as involved as I can be.

Public Servant, I may say hateful thing's, but I can assure you, I am driven by love, as only love for ones people, heritage and family can drive someone to be targetted as I am.

You are not the first, and undoubtedly you wont be the last.