My first gun was a SA XDm 9mm purchased new in November of 08. I wanted capacity, relatively inexpensive practice ammo(compared to .40 and .45), and yet a good defensive round as well. I don't regret my purchase so I don't ever intend to sell my XDm. However, if I had to do it all over again, I would go with a full size, steel 1911. A second gun purchase in .22lr would have followed soon after for training purposes. I made the mistake of shooting one of my dad's Kimbers. Once I got bit with the 1911 bug and felt the SA trigger in action, I find that polymer handguns just don't interest me very much any more. If I had to rank my trigger preference from first to last, it would be SA first, striker-fired second, and DA/SA a distant third.
My first purchase was a brand-new blued Norinco 1911A1 in .45 ACP. I had spent several hundred dollars in modifications on it , as well. The weapon was a flawless shooter & very accurate. I eventually sold it & kind of regret selling it. However, knowing what I now know... If I could time travel, I would tell my less wise, younger self to spend those hundreds of dollars on a quality heirloom, such as a Colt Gold Cup.
20+ years later, I finally have a Colt 1911 and wish I had bought one sooner. I will never buy any 1911 of lesser quality again.
Moral of the story: If you want a 1911... Save your money and buy a Quality 1911 that will increase in value & you would be proud to pass on to your children
...
I'm also a firm believer of everyone's first (defensive) handgun being a full size, steel frame. I feel as if it gives a great platform to learn on. Low recoil, much more accurate than compacts, or subs, and they most all have safeties (something that I feel everyone new owner should get use to using).
Wow! You're the only one here besides me who has ever been quoted as saying new users should have safeties. I agree. I also agree about large, steel frames.