I don't have to visit any range to know that there are MANY modern designs that are superior to a low capacity 98 year old design for serious use. For gun games at the range? Yeah, 1911's are pretty sweet for that. Even a trained monkey can hit the 10 ring with a hair trigger and a 5" barrel. I'm not into games, though. My guns are for serious use.
Although the OP is full of doo-doo regarding the 1911 being superior because the military used it, he does have a point regarding serious use of sidearms in general. The 1911 design is still in use in very limited numbers, but the vast majority of police/military units use something more reliable with greater capacity. Not just Glocks, but Sigs, HKs, Berettas and other weapons.
8 or 9 rounds of .45 in a sometimes reliable platform vs. 16 rounds of 9mm in a G19 or 13 rounds of 357 or 40 in a Sig P226 or HK USP? Or 13 rounds of 45 in a G21, XD or HK USP? Pffft. No contest.
Then again, my guns are tools. Not objects of unbridled lust and he-man fantasy.
As I said...otherwise all I'm hearing is
Yes, military and LE do choose other platforms, BUT some still pick the 1911. Whether YOU like it or not doesn't mean it isn't capable. Why would the FBI SWAT pick a 1911 when they could pick anything they wanted? It sure as hell was not about money.
Serious use? I guess everyone has their own definition.
I won't deny most modern pistols are great, but I will not dismiss old pistols simply because my preference.
Good myth too on show, I know Glock owners who treat them as safe queens. But I suppose they day I spend the money on SOMEONE ELSE'S firearm choice I can criticize their choice.
As I've said over and over...MY Glock 21 was a POS...even a die hard Glock fan saw it and couldn't deny it.