Has anyone asked Guy Relford about this?
It would depend on what the cops were told. Here you likely have the security guard calling 911 and then dispatchers advising the cops. The officer could be getting information two or three people removed. I think the officers would definitely have RAS for a Terry frisk, but if they didn't find anything, no further reason to investigate. If the officer felt a gun in the pat down of outer garments, then they could clearly ask for LTCH.
If that is the case, just add another 0 to the check.
I've heard of these things, and I'm kinda surprised the legal departments are OKing these. My guess is that with all large entities, there is likely mixed messages. The lawyers likely think the devices only prohibit entry, but don't confine the person, or that the programing is supposed to be set to prohibit entry only. After the first few lawsuits, you can bet instructions will be made much clearer.
One other thing...
If you have an account, then you have a contractual interest. They can't deny entry or ask you to leave.
Woods v. State of Indiana :: December, 1998 :: Indiana Court of Appeals Decisions :: Indiana Case Law :: US Case Law :: US Law :: Justia
I would also do thatMake sure if you get locked in one that you call 911 first and report that you are being held against your will.
I installed that man trap along with a few others for fifth third. They justified installing them so they didn't have to pay off duty officers to watch them. It's all about the money.I left fifth third a long time ago. the man trap is scary. they have the man trap at the branch near 38th and college, and it disturbed me even before I started carrying. i left them for reasons separate from their anti2a stance, but it does remind me that i made the correct choice.
I think both of these issues have already been brought up earlier in the thread.Yeh, I'd leave that bank in a heartbeat. Question one would be, is this criminal confinement, I mean by that, are they illegally confining you if you're breaking no laws? Second question is, I was pretty sure there was case law that made it so that banks could not refuse you access to their facilities since ownership of an account with them constituted a financial contract and part of that contract is providing you access to your funds. I recall reading a very long article on this where the bank lost and the police department was sued for forcibly removing a man from a bank where he had an account.
Every member of INGO combined couldn't equal the money that a few of 5/3rds large corporate customers have on deposit or have borrowed. Boycott all you want but don't expect much in the way of results. Now if enough small business owners who are passionate about gun rights raise he** that might do some good.Well, if enough people leave the bank, they might rethink it.
Also, if everyone carries metal, and constantly sets the detector off, they'll ignore it.
And the cops will charge them fines if they are constantly called.
And as Titanium Frost mentioned, what about a panic attack induced by claustrophobia. I've encountered many people with claustrophobia. The panic is pretty much guaranteed.
Every member of INGO combined couldn't equal the money that a few of 5/3rds large corporate customers have on deposit or have borrowed. Boycott all you want but don't expect much in the way of results. Now if enough small business owners who are passionate about gun rights raise he** that might do some good.