They'd probably outlaw ammo so no sweat.I do not think he can right now since he might appeal this decision as such it's an on going case for him so he needs to keep his cards close to his vest. It's best not to give the other side any more ammo.
-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
Hammond is looking for trouble
- Thread starter mainjet
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
IN_Sheepdog
Expert
Astute observation my dear Jedi...
the legal force is strong with this Padwan!
Or still drowning his sorrows...Guess you will just have to settle for me...
eldirector
Grandmaster
They already did. Well, at least .22LR bulk packs (more than 500 rounds).
Astute observation my dear Jedi...
the legal force is strong with this Padwan!
Guess you will just have to settle for me...
& the only reason we keep you around is cause u r from da region.
Looks like you were right.I do not think he can right now since he might appeal this decision as such it's an on going case for him so he needs to keep his cards close to his vest. It's best not to give the other side any more ammo.
Attorney in Hammond gun lawsuit says he'll appeal ruling
The Hammond Times had a story that was letting residents know that the Hammond city ordinances are now available online. http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/lake/hammond/hammond-city-ordinances-are-available-to-residents-online/article_d9268034-6ddb-59a5-8dba-34aa4f8cf560.html
I went to the link and found this -
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Indiana/hammond_in/cityofhammondindianacodeofordinances?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:hammond_in
Title XIII:General Offences
132.074
It says you may not have a firearm - in any public building owned or leased by the city, or at any board or commission meeting of the city, regardless of whether the person has a "state permit to carry a firearm"
I went to the link and found this -
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Indiana/hammond_in/cityofhammondindianacodeofordinances?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:hammond_in
Title XIII:General Offences
132.074
It says you may not have a firearm - in any public building owned or leased by the city, or at any board or commission meeting of the city, regardless of whether the person has a "state permit to carry a firearm"
No I didn't.
I should have put the same disclaimer on my post
It's for informational purposes only. If you want the latest scoop ask the lawyer suing the City of Hammond because of this ordinance.GEESH. You post something as law and then say "oh by the way, this may not be correct". What is a person to do - trust it or not? Then they say that ignorance of the law is not a defense.
Last edited:
eldirector
Grandmaster
Right on the front page of that site (second link in your post):
I still fail to see how this is relevant. Either they have the ordinance or not. I really don't care what is posted on some 3rd party website.
Sounds like a direct act of intimidation. Someone needs to volunteer to carry openly into a city building and if they are arrested then they have "standing" to sue the city. Anyone? Anyone? (I can't go because I live in Evansville and gas is too expensive. If it was only $3.85/gal I would do it.
)Sounds like a direct act of intimidation. Someone needs to volunteer to carry openly into a city building and if they are arrested then they have "standing" to sue the city. Anyone? Anyone? (I can't go because I live in Evansville and gas is too expensive. If it was only $3.85/gal I would do it.
I will pay for your gas. I will also hold your beer while you do this
Thanks, but...uh....you see I just had carpal tunnel surgery on my left wrist two weeks ago and will have the stitches out tomorrow. Doc says I can't drive more than 200 miles away from Evansville. Sorry.I will pay for your gas. I will also hold your beer while you do this
According to the Judge it's relevant. That's what the decision was based on in favor of the city.Right on the front page of that site (second link in your post):
I still fail to see how this is relevant. Either they have the ordinance or not. I really don't care what is posted on some 3rd party website.
I agree with you though. Regardless of what the website says the ordinance is still on the books and has yet to be dealt with in that capacity. I guess it needs a direct challenge as in if they actually try to enforce it.
I think mrortega has volunteered to be the test case and mainjet has offered to pay for his gas.
He offered to hold my beer. It's probably illegal to carry into public places while holding a beer. If there was an organization called INBEER to back me up legally I'd do it in a heart beat.According to the Judge it's relevant. That's what the decision was based on in favor of the city.
I agree with you though. Regardless of what the website says the ordinance is still on the books and has yet to be dealt with in that capacity. I guess it needs a direct challenge as in if they actually try to enforce it.
I think mrortega has volunteered to be the test case and mainjet has offered to pay for his gas.
You need somebody a lot braver than me to be a test case. Have you tried......Titanium Frost? I am not even worthy to lace up his gun belt.
To correct errors?
Hu??So this will be round 1.5 of you getting another whooping.
Just bow down to your MASTER "Da Mayor", kiss his ring and pledge your vote to him for now and forever and he "might" forgive you.
No the judge did not error. Ya just don't like how he ruled.
Bow down adn kiss the Mayor's ring and all may be forgiven.
