hullo. Odd first post to say the least.That’s exactly what America or anywhere doesn’t need is a woman in charge of anything
Basically we don't want purple-haired rabid 3rd wave feminists tracking their womanhood all over policy. In the same sense, we recognize this guy isn't any better:
View attachment 257951
On the other hand, we're not any worse off having a strong, sensible female leader than a strong, sensible male leader. It's the bat **** crazy, ideological part that's bad.
There are no "leaders" worth following until they follow the vision of the forefathers and the Constitutional path for governance including the restrictions placed upon them thereof that has been laid out by the wisdom of the forefathers on behalf of "We the People"Some seem to think they need a leader to follow.
Some do not.
Are YOU Running for POTUS?Women shouldn’t even be allowed to vote the constitution as it was originally written was correct and we See the consequences of letting women vote now
Women shouldn’t even be allowed to vote the constitution as it was originally written was correct and we See the consequences of letting women vote now
Start the amendment and let the country revisit this decision.Women shouldn’t even be allowed to vote the constitution as it was originally written was correct and we See the consequences of letting women vote now
Seven years on INGO and this how you start posting?Women shouldn’t even be allowed to vote the constitution as it was originally written was correct and we See the consequences of letting women vote now
Women shouldn’t even be allowed to vote the constitution as it was originally written was correct and we See the consequences of letting women vote now
That’s the wrong criterion. In a free society any citizen subject to its laws should have a say in those laws. You’re establishing just another category of aristocracy.I would say those who do not own property should not have suffrage.
That’s the wrong criterion. In a free society any citizen subject to its laws should have a say in those laws. You’re establishing just another category of aristocracy.