I spent about 5 minutes on DDG. The total fees that Visa (the only card we carry) charges retailers is 1.34% to 3.39%, with a (legal) maximum of 4%. Any surcharge from the retailer at all would cause me to consider that additional cost when comparing vendors. Anything over 4% gets me on the horn to the FTC.
I don't even care about retailers charging less for cash. I don't care if online retailers charge extra for shipping. If price is a consideration, it's the total price we care about, right?
Well I just looked at Disney. Seems go woke go broke never affected them. They still turning profits, this past year 3% profit and brought in even more money. Some areas they lost, other areas went up. But over all any boycotts and what ever didn’t phase them. If people wanted to hurt Disney they could just stop going, buying and it appears few care. I was disappointed when I reviewed the numbers.
Because they already have half the money and all of the p——y!Indeed. Why is that bad? Please explain.
Or, c) find a vendor who doesn't charge a cc fee.
Bring a check or cash = no additional cost.
Or, c) find a vendor who doesn't charge a cc fee.
This is the disconnect right here. They ALL charge a CC fee, ALL of them. Only the places that have a sign offer an option. What really irks me is that those of us that pay cash should not have to participate in the CC schemes whereby the retailer collects a fee, sends it to the CC company, they give the consumer a pittance back.Or, c) find a vendor who doesn't charge a cc fee.
It seems to me that the obvious solution is to set the price such that the CC transaction fee is incorporated, and then offer a cash discount.I have absolutely no problem with a business charging what they need to charge to make money.
My sister used to be really big on businesses charging more for credit card purchases (she’s mellowed out about it now), but I used to tell her when she was ranting about some place she went having a cash discount/charging more for CC purchases “if you like going there, STFU, if you don’t like going there, DON’T ****ING GO THERE”!!!!
It’s not, and never should have been rocket science, but some people don’t understand that a business is actually there to make someone money.
Well I just looked at Disney. Seems go woke go broke never affected them. They still turning profits, this past year 3% profit and brought in even more money. Some areas they lost, other areas went up. But over all any boycotts and what ever didn’t phase them. If people wanted to hurt Disney they could just stop going, buying and it appears few care. I was disappointed when I reviewed the numbers.
Not all a simple stock filing that are manipulated…ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
They are also well short of the cash needed for the forced Hulu/comcast deal they made.
We’re no closer to knowing who will own Hulu next year
Disney is getting cold feet. Comcast is open to offers.www.theverge.com
Disney “Very Comfortable With Current Liquidity Position” As Deadline Nears To Buy Rest Of Hulu
Disney CFO Kevin Lansberry is comfortable with the company's liquidity position as the deadline nears to buy rest of Hulu From Comcast.deadline.com
You do not start selling your assets(ESPN may be one soon)if you are financially secure.Disney could soon sell its TV assets as Iger says business 'may not be core' to the company
Disney CEO Bob Iger appeared for an interview with CNBC's David Faber the morning after announcing a contract extension through 2026.www.cnbc.com
oh no
Does putting up without ridiculing printcraft on INGO warrant an instant 10% discount?
You guys want me to start a "CC Fee Arguments" thread for you and provide a link?
Depends. You paying cash or credit?How much will it cost me?