The gop, racing towards electoral irrelevancy. One race at a time.
Republicans are their own worst enemies. All we've got to deal with is cowardly voters afraid to change from the insane to the sane.Yep, someday they'll be as ineffective as the Libertarians. Well, maybe not quite that impotent.
And candidates who practically no one has ever heard of or likely ever will.
The truly sad thing is that the handful of republicans in her district will still vote for her. If she was in Indiana then Hoosier republicans and "conservatives" would vote for her over better candidates. Anybody but the other guys.
"Abortions should not be used for birth control,"
"I am a conservative Republican and I believe in God first,"
"God is angry. We are provoking him with abortions and same-sex marriage and civil unions," she said. "Same-sex activity is going to increase AIDS. If it's in our military it will weaken our military. We need to respect God."
The truly sad thing is that the handful of republicans in her district will still vote for her. If she was in Indiana then Hoosier republicans and "conservatives" would vote for her over better candidates. Anybody but the other guys.
I don't think mrarrell was refering to blind party allegiance, but more to the primaries. The Lugar/Murdock fiasco is a good example.The EXACT same thing can be said of Democrats. Too many people vote party and not candidate, that is how we got the current crop of nut jobs in office now.
Doubt it. The republicans / tea party are doing just fine all by themselves.As for the loon that is the subject of the original post. WTF? Is she secretly being sponsored by the Democrats in an effort to derail the Republican bid for that seat?
I don't think mrarrell was refering to blind party allegiance, but more to the primaries. The Lugar/Murdock fiasco is a good example.
OK, point taken.
Doubt it. The republicans / tea party are doing just fine all by themselves.
The truly sad thing is that the handful of republicans in her district will still vote for her. If she was in Indiana then Hoosier republicans and "conservatives" would vote for her over better candidates. Anybody but the other guys.
OK I have researched many websites including this one
9th congressional GOP hopefuls differ on many issues - DailyHerald.com
that supposedly has the quote.
Here are the only quotes I found.
"Abortions should not be used for birth control,"
"I am a conservative Republican and I believe in God first,"
"God is angry. We are provoking him with abortions and same-sex marriage and civil unions," she said. "Same-sex activity is going to increase AIDS. If it's in our military it will weaken our military. We need to respect God."
Now I will admit that those quotes are inflammatory but they are an opinion held my many Americans.
It's one of those things that there is real separation between beliefs.
But HERE IS MY POINT:
I want to see or hear her own words.
All of it.
THEN I will decide.
Remember Phil Robertson and how what he actually said was quite different from what was reported?
Remember George Zimmerman's phone recording edits that made him sound like a racist?
Frankly, I am surprised at the number of people here that are just rushing to judgment.
Maybe she DID say it, and she would then deserve all of the wrath, but I don't trust any of those liberal web pages that are reporting this.
What does she say about..... actual policy?