Is stealing from the pocket of a huge corporation morally superior to stealing from the pocket of your neighbor?
Only if it's BP.
Is stealing from the pocket of a huge corporation morally superior to stealing from the pocket of your neighbor?
Is stealing from the pocket of a huge corporation morally superior to stealing from the pocket of your neighbor?
Why people would want to steal from him is beyond my comprehension.
If a website mistakenly posts an item for sale for $0.01, you buy it, and they cancel your order because it was a typo, are you mad? I ask this to as an analogy to the initial question.
Would anyone be upset if the store posted pics of their plates for the people who purchased gas for a penny?
Many stores have a policy that if something is mis-priced or stocked in the wrong location giving the appearance of a lower price, they will honor it.
A while back at Walmart I bought 2 500rd boxes (10x50rd) of Wildcat .22lr for $1.99 each because someone stocked them wrong and didn't feel like a criminal.
No. Clearly not. It is stealing.
I simply added in the "pocket of your neighbor" part to emphasis that these thieves probably shop at the same grocery stores and have kids attending the same schools as the guy from who they are stealing. The guy they are stealing from probably sponsors a little league team in the community, perhaps a bowling team, and probably donates coffee to the local police officers too. Why people would want to steal from him is beyond my comprehension.
I must admit that I'm torn. You are right of course that stealing from one is the same as stealing from the other. However, as chezuki pointed out, most stores will honor an incorrect price if it is their fault.
Many stores have a policy that if something is mis-priced or stocked in the wrong location giving the appearance of a lower price, they will honor it.
A while back at Walmart I bought 2 500rd boxes (10x50rd) of Wildcat .22lr for $1.99 each because someone stocked them wrong and didn't feel like a criminal.
BP will still get the money, it's the store owner who will pay the difference.No, unless it were a BP, then yes. I would consider it restitution for me having to overpay for shrimp.
When I was a kid my old man bought a house on the far south side of Indy. He paid $11,000 for it. That same house recently sold for over $220,000.Until they start charging a "fair" price.
House gouger!When I was a kid my old man bought a house on the far south side of Indy. He paid $11,000 for it. That same house recently sold for over $220,000.
When he bought that house gas was around $0.40/gallon. Gas would need to be over $8/gallon just to keep up with the cost of housing.