There's no way I can be following you correctly. As I just read that, you seem to be calling me un-American for believing that there are people out there who will base their decisions about a person on the color of their skin.
Or are we getting "racism" and "institutional racism" confused? I'd agree that institutional racism has been long gone for a long time, but there are for sure still racist people out there.
No, I wasn't calling you that. I was intending it to be for anyone who thinks racism at any practical level is still a factor. I just didn't word it as well as I intended to, sorry.
Thought policing is something I find deeply disturbing, and the concept of eliminating racism outside of the institutional level, a horrifying prospect for anyone who values liberty and individual expression.
As long as you can sue for discrimination, and have a reasonable chance of winning your case, I don't believe racism is a factor that matters.
Someone holding prejudiced views who isn't actually hurting anyone or breaking the law should be the last thing any sane person is concerned about.
There is another form of racism, that I do believe, is becoming an actual problem. But it is not the kind of racism the likes of BLM or progressives seek to challenge.
It is the concept that racism is a one way street, and that discrimination should be permissible based on skin color from an institutional level. It's the pendulum swinging so far beyond the desired objective it's bring about an inverse Jim Crow era. An Era where simply not being vocal about your support for any given progressive agenda is enough to get you fired, cause you to lose favor in a criminal case, and suffer severe social ostracism.
California just repealed their anti-discrimination laws, allowing racial discrimination for public positions.
It still must pass a ballot initiative, but it shows you what the future holds and how these people think.
Last edited: