The problem of debating any point with the INGO wolf-pack is that they cover everything from generalizations to ratione extrema.
I find no value here in arguing with those who can't see the broader picture.
I'm going to go watch "Billions".
That's yet another false dichotomy. So we should agree with you or we don't see the broader picture? What if we do see a broader picture, but because of a different world view, the broader pictures are different. I am not astonished that a person who has a collectivist mentality wouldn't see the broader picture from an individualist's perspective.