But, is it really a few, dross? Sure, they catch lots of them and even prosecute some. But, how many go unreported or get off with a slap on the wrist? I routinely see about a dozen incidents a day reported, (sometimes more). Granted, many of these bad cop reports are instances where they were caught and punished. I don't see anything like that kind of reporting for EMS, Fire or most other professions. It seems like there is an epidemic across the country of bad actors in the enforcer community. How many do we have to see before it stops being a "few"?
^^This, and if not complicit, at least complacent.I don't disagree. I submit that my point is larger. A few, a lot, however many there are only exist at the largesse of their fellow "good" cops, who cloak themselves in blue rather than expose their bad fellows. That was my larger point.
I truly believe that most cops don't approve, but the system neuters their disapproval to the point they become complicit.
IBTDCLEOL
In Before The Don't Criticize Law Enforcement Officers Lock
I've personally never had a bad interaction with a LEO but have had one or two try to intimidate me with their "authoritah" which fortunately for all involved it never went beyond the threat to me and my response of "I have a lawyer that loves cases like this".
I wouldn't want their job nowadays and I don't have the answer, just making an observation.
They'll stop breaking the law when humans in general stop breaking the law. Police are, after all, human. Statistically speaking they are just as likely to do something unlawful as the general population is.
All we can do is work to catch them when they do something unlawful, and in my opinion, impose stiffer penalties when convicted.
There is nothing worse than being given a position of power over people then using that position to conduct criminal activities. As an example, if assault carries a 5 year sentence for civilians, then it should carry a 10 year sentence for a police officer if the commit the crime while on duty.
Do you have a citation to back up your assertions? From what I've seen, over the years, most cops get a pass or easier sentencing when they're caught committing a crime. This case is a prime example.Im gonna have to disagree. Cops are 5 times more likely to be convicted via shady evidence than the average citizen. Why? Because convicting "dirty" cops is a prosecutors wet dream... political ambition plain and simple.
Do you have a citation to back up your assertions? From what I've seen, over the years, most cops get a pass or easier sentencing when they're caught committing a crime. This case is a prime example.
The union said they didn't deserve termination for falsifying police reports.
"They didn't deserve termination," Nick Rogers, president of the Police Protective Association, said. "At the end of the day, you actually have human beings who were out trying to protect the public and were doing it and were darn good cops at the time. They will come back and they will be good cops again."
What kind of standards does this police union have? Absolutely unreal. Do good cops occasionally get caught falsifying documents in their favor?