Evansville Sued for Violating Gun Owner's Rights

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    May 6, 2012
    2,152
    48
    Mishawaka
    None of them, the way I heard it, he went Full Retard, kicked a gnu, tripped the penguins, then took the tennis balls off some old lady's walker and threw them at the Bald Eagle just before they tazed him and took him to the State Hospital in Logansport where he convinced an Indian to bust them all out by throwing a huge sink through a window.
    :D

    This almost sounds like an episode of "Walking Dead" :):

    If the ante is upped to a shiny new dime, I'll wager a guess.. otherwise, I ain't touching it. :laugh:
     

    GBuck

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    56   0   0
    Jul 18, 2011
    20,222
    48
    Franklin
    I'll just leave this here.

    Court of Appeals decision could have impact on local case involving armed zoo patron » Evansville Courier & Press

    I noticed that no one was called a time bomb this time...
    Finally had time to read this and the comments that follow. That "seabreeze" is something else.

    Here's an idea for all the morons commenting about scaring kids on that thread (I assume at least a few of them follow this site/thread). Instead of asking, "Why would you want to scare the children?" ask yourself, "Why am I teaching my children to be afraid of an inanimate object?"


    Guns are Baa'aa'aa'aahd. :sheep:
     

    Hammerhead

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 2, 2010
    2,780
    38
    Bartholomew County
    I really want to make a comment here, but I fear that I would 1) be repeating myself, 2) be pointing out the obvious about the lack of common sense found in the court, the media, and the public, and 3) be repeating myself.

    All I can do is :facepalm:.
     

    beararms1776

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 5, 2010
    3,407
    38
    INGO
    Heck, you don't have to be armed to frighten animals. If seabreeze knew me, it would be frightened just at the sight of me enjoying my day, minding my own buisness and being myself. Heck, he'd probably be the one to throw a wrench in there because of it.
     

    Stschil

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 24, 2010
    5,995
    63
    At the edge of sanit
    Trial is off until Hammond is ruled on by the court of appeals since it wasn't very clear in the story. If Guy wins in Hammond we win by default.

    Sounds like your judge is afraid to be the one who sets precedent. Afraid I he rules in your favor, he loses lib $$ support, or if he rules for the City, he'll lose his reputation when the Appeals Court strikes it.
     

    Bill B

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Sep 2, 2009
    5,214
    48
    RA 0 DEC 0
    I love how people keep adding to the story in the comments.

    First, TF scared the sheeple and the children. Then, the (four) police officers kindly asked him to cover up. Frosty then became disorderly. Then he went full rage monster. Then they asked him to leave. Then they removed him. Then they forcibly removed him. Then he was arrested.

    I'll give you a shiny new nickel if you can find the sentence in the above paragraph that is factual.

    Go ahead. I'll wait.

    Well, TF was at the zoo.
    Can I have an old (pre-65) nickel instead of a new one:):
     

    thebishopp

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 26, 2010
    1,286
    38
    Indiana
    Trial is off until Hammond is ruled on by the court of appeals since it wasn't very clear in the story. If Guy wins in Hammond we win by default.

    Isn't Evansville's claim that you were committing a criminal act (disorderly conduct) and not that they were enforcing an unlawful ordinance?

    If so then how would a CoA ruling be a default victory in your lawsuit? It would seem more that as long as a city continued to have the unlawful ordinance on the books then any and every citizen could file a lawsuit until such ordinance was repealed.

    It would seem that Guy is going after the easier of the two cases to win (clear violation of state law in enforcing an unlawful ordinance) but the city's stance isn't that they were enforcing an ordinance, nor were they there to enforce an ordinance, but that you were engaging in criminal conduct which in their discretion (as allowed by law) they elected not to arrest you and just escorted you from the property.
     
    Top Bottom