That's the worst deal in the history of trade deals, maybe ever.
Which shows how poor Trump’s judgement is.That's the worst deal in the history of trade deals, maybe ever.
If you scroll down after reading that article, there is another one that talks about how Americans for Prosperity is saying the same things about distancing themselves from Trump.Club for Growth Distances Itself Further From Trump
WASHINGTON — The Club for Growth, a conservative anti-tax group that spent nearly $150 million in the past two election cycles, has invited a half-dozen potential Republican presidential candidates to its annual donor retreat next month — but not Donald Trump. In a meeting with reporters Monday...news.yahoo.com
DeSantis headlines, Trump not invited
Seems like yet another reason to favor the Orange Man to me
Not what polls are showing…How dare DeSantis be more popular! I kinda think Trump’s probably realizes that no one but Trumpers are buying it. He’s trying to send a message about how a contest with hum will go, to scare DeSantis off.
Why is it surprising that RINO’s, who do not want to Make America Great Again, that Trump exposed with his MAGA agenda, are against MAGA?If you scroll down after reading that article, there is another one that talks about how Americans for Prosperity is saying the same things about distancing themselves from Trump.
So, would you like your president to do what's good for the country or just what's good for his personal politics
Do you think allowing PR to be a state is good for the country? I do not
Yup, and while there are 3.4M Puerto Ricans in PR, there are 5.6M settled in the 50 states. Allowing PR statehood determination has been a Republican party plank for decades... do you think Trump "**** no" to PR statehood garners any of those votes?And your point? That is pretty much just freedom to travel to and from or settle in the 50 states. That is a far cry from statehood
Depends on the poll.Not what polls are showing…
Or. Is it surprising that many .orgs think Trump is toxic? Favorable policies, mostly, but ****ty person.Why is it surprising that RINO’s, who do not want to Make America Great Again, that Trump exposed with his MAGA agenda, are against MAGA?
Seems very logical to me and unremarkable other than I regret the years such groups fooled me into believing they were for America…
Sounds a lot like the Left's strategy anyway. Impeach first and figure out why later.Sounds like criticize first and figure out a reason afterwards.
I this an irrelevant question since it is all about following the money. Do you really think if Trump was CFGF (club for growth first) they would have any qualms? Heck they would provide him the strippers to **** when his wife was busy…Or. Is it surprising that many .orgs think Trump is toxic? Favorable policies, mostly, but ****ty person.
Club for Growth fought hard against the Trump candidacy in the run up to 2016, likely because they are not fans of America FirstOr. Is it surprising that many .orgs think Trump is toxic? Favorable policies, mostly, but ****ty person.
CFG was not alone in thinking that Trump was the "worst" possible candidate in the 2016 primaries and the easiest for Hillary to beat. MSM and the entire liberal Hollywood left gave him every possible opportunity to upset the GOP Primary "front runners"... not because they wanted a Trump presidency, or even entertained such an idea, but because they saw that as unpossible... making Hillary's crowning a foregone conclusion.Club for Growth fought hard against the Trump candidacy in the run up to 2016, likely because they are not fans of America First
They then cozied up to him when he had real power, and that is a knock on Trump in my book for not keeping them at arms length. Having said that, I now expect to be taken to task because had Trump done so he would not be cultivating the votes of people who hated him. I know this because the gestalt is that Trump is always wrong
If Trump wins, I fully expect that the Club forOligarchsGrowth and Americans forbillionairesProsperity (another Libertarian group and thus no friends of America First) will be prominent in the receiving line. Funny how so few billionaires are in favor of strong borders, isn't it
Like the purported incestuous pictures of Trump with Ivanka, context is important. But dayam, Trump must feel desperate if he feels like this is necessary before Desantis even announces.
Most of this is spot on, the media gave him millions in exposure, mostly exposure designed to humiliate republicans. For instance while trying to make Trump a politically incorrect racist they allowed his message of securing the border to get out and build momentum that still runs in conservatives today.CFG was not alone in thinking that Trump was the "worst" possible candidate in the 2016 primaries and the easiest for Hillary to beat. MSM and the entire liberal Hollywood left gave him every possible opportunity to upset the GOP Primary "front runners"... not because they wanted a Trump presidency, or even entertained such an idea, but because they saw that as unpossible... making Hillary's crowning a foregone conclusion.
Not true. You can’t say a clear majority. The winner of a primary doesn’t imply a majority. If primary elections were held on the same day, the choice for everyone would be the entire list of candidates. Only then could you say that. And even then it’s unlikely a candidate will have majority in a crowded field because the available votes are distributed across the field of candidates.Most of this is spot on, the media gave him millions in exposure, mostly exposure designed to humiliate republicans. For instance while trying to make Trump a politically incorrect racist they allowed his message of securing the border to get out and build momentum that still runs in conservatives today.
I would not say they gave the win over others in the primary because at the end of the day a clear majority of republicans wanted a fighter who said bad thins unapologetically…
I would not say they gave the win over others in the primary because at the end of the day a clear majority of republicans wanted a fighter who said bad thins unapologetically…
I did not reference the primary specificly in that comment. Pointing out how the media helped get the message out Trump wanted to get out. I do believe if the Indiana primary had been contested Trump still would have won…Not true. You can’t say a clear majority. The winner of a primary doesn’t imply a majority. If primary elections were held on the same day, the choice for everyone would be the entire list of candidates. Only then could you say that. And even then it’s unlikely a candidate will have majority in a crowded field because the available votes are distributed across the field of candidates.
By the time Indiana’s primary had rolled around, there were only two choices left for GOP. Hoosiers’ votes were distributed across just the two candidates. In our staggered primary process, earlier states successively eliminate the choices for remaining state primaries. It’s not a popularity contest.
Primaries are a last man standing kind of election process. So a candidate who knows how to play the game, not necessarily the best or most popular candidate, especially if the media really wants that candidate, will have a huge advantage over other candidates.
Yes, you DID reference the primary specifically. I do think the media pushing Trump because they wanted the weaker candidate to win, did help Trump gain popularity, because that was the goal. And it worked. Trump won, not by convincing a majority of Republicans that he was the best nominee. He won because the field shrank successively as the Primary season progressed. And at the end of which, Trump got the nomination, and had to convince skeptics to give him a go in the general. That's not what majority support looks like when ~half your voters have to hold their noses.I did not reference the primary specificly in that comment. Pointing out how the media helped get the message out Trump wanted to get out. I do believe if the Indiana primary had been contested Trump still would have won…