I guess they changed it as originally debated to exempt retired LEO's from the ordinance. If "assault weapons" are death machines and "only good for killing as many people as possible" why would a retired cop need one?
Limitations are constitutional. They are not eliminating the right.This cannot be allowed to stand, how can a local municipality just eliminate someone's constitutional rights with a vote and pen stroke?
Yep. I'd like to think that I have contributed to their financial woes since I put that corrupt sh*t hole in my rear-view mirror 6 years ago, taking my exorbitant property tax $$ with me.Illinois is broke they can't even pay lottery winners that win in their state. Just another cash flow of money their hoping for.
Deerfield bans assault weapons and high-capacity magazines - Deerfield Review
These folks are off their rocker. Only the bad guys will have assault weapons.
Can we build a wall along the Illinois border?
Damned lawyers!No doctor's gonna fix THIS problem. It's gonna take LAWYERS.
...Just another cash flow of money their hoping for.
Isn't the standing case from the same Appellate Court going to serve to sustain this law/ordinance? I thought this one is similar to the other burb over there that SCOTUS refused to take up.Damned lawyers!
Hopefully Gottlieb will have success with this one.
Isn't the standing case from the same Appellate Court going to serve to sustain this law/ordinance? I thought this one is similar to the other burb over there that SCOTUS refused to take up.
Hey lawyer types. What does it take to get a case to get looked at by the courts when a similar case went through the court previously?Isn't the standing case from the same Appellate Court going to serve to sustain this law/ordinance? I thought this one is similar to the other burb over there that SCOTUS refused to take up.
...but the state preemption statute was drafted full of holes.
Hey lawyer types. What does it take to get a case to get looked at by the courts when a similar case went through the court previously?