Alright, I screwed up the quotes thing pretty bad. "IMG" isn't quote, obviously. Trying again.
FN isn't on the list, so while I appreciate that recommendation its a no-go.
Any specific thing? I mean, certain brands of AKs used to sometimes have canted front sight posts, so you knew to look for that and if they were straight the rest of the gun was probably solid. Does SIG have a particular issue I can look for or is just an over all decline?
I'm going to go poke around at the H&K and the SIG line up when I get a chance, along with the M&P. If I don't find a .45 I like I'll probably stick with the Glock I already own. 9mm would add another caliber to stock for my collection and it'd have to be pretty impressive for me to add another DAO .40.[/QUOTE]
I prefer my FNP over all of them, and they make an FNP in .45
FN isn't on the list, so while I appreciate that recommendation its a no-go.
Sig quality has suffered in the last few years.
Any specific thing? I mean, certain brands of AKs used to sometimes have canted front sight posts, so you knew to look for that and if they were straight the rest of the gun was probably solid. Does SIG have a particular issue I can look for or is just an over all decline?
I'm going to go poke around at the H&K and the SIG line up when I get a chance, along with the M&P. If I don't find a .45 I like I'll probably stick with the Glock I already own. 9mm would add another caliber to stock for my collection and it'd have to be pretty impressive for me to add another DAO .40.[/QUOTE]