Coronavirus II

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,570
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Yep. They want to create dependence on the welfare and not use it as it was intended as a hand up.
    Just like I'm sure the democRAT leadership intentionally wanted people to get more unemployment money than they ever made on their checks. They knew a lot of people in their "target group" would quit their jobs to go get that "free" money.

    Under the 'am I paranoid enough' rubric, an somewhat crazy idea keeps nibbling at my mind. What if the left is taking a lesson from history, the lesson that it took a complete shattering of the economy and hard times for almnost everybody in order to make sweeping changes towards socialism. Specifically electing FDR as some sort of savior and allowing him to make changes so radical he wanted to pack the supreme court in order to get his way. Since many things they want to do would seem aimed at making the problems worse, perhaps they've concluded they need a similar level of crisis to get progressivism progressing again. I don't see Trump playing Hoover, though

    I don't think he actually has that much influence directly, but Soros is amoral enough to function as a sort of Dr Strangelove for the movement. Don't know who might be the Blofeld
     

    Vigilant

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Jul 12, 2008
    11,659
    83
    Plainfield
    Did you cave to the government's heavy hand or did you sue for your rights?
    You’re evidently out of touch with reality. Number ONE, I didn’t cave, business STOPPED, no money to pay for services, equals no services. Number two sue who, the government, with what no business means NO money. Number three, even if there were money for two, courts aren’t operating for anything other than the most pressing matters. A small business owner suing the .gov isn’t that. I’ve been out everyday looking to keep my business running, but everyday, more potential customers and current customers close, some for good. Those who are still getting paid for their essential work, will find those jobs drying up soon as well, this cannot go on much longer or we’ll see a Depression FAR worse than The Great Depression.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,570
    149
    Columbus, OH
    I've wondered since the beginning of this thing how much of the reaction was based on limiting liability. How many decisions were made based on concerns about firms like "the screwdriver" filing huge wrongful death claims over grandma passing from covid?

    As long as that sort of suit has a better chance of the plaintiff striking it rich than the lottery, you're going to have that type of concern being a thing

    Put a tail on the lucre
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    52,161
    113
    Mitchell
    You’re evidently out of touch with reality. Number ONE, I didn’t cave, business STOPPED, no money to pay for services, equals no services. Number two sue who, the government, with what no business means NO money. Number three, even if there were money for two, courts aren’t operating for anything other than the most pressing matters. A small business owner suing the .gov isn’t that. I’ve been out everyday looking to keep my business running, but everyday, more potential customers and current customers close, some for good. Those who are still getting paid for their essential work, will find those jobs drying up soon as well, this cannot go on much longer or we’ll see a Depression FAR worse than The Great Depression.

    I might be naive but I’m hoping Trump is getting close to kicking Dr. “Papers Please!” And the scarf queen back to the lab and start telling the governors to let ‘Er rip.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,570
    149
    Columbus, OH
    And as se often say on INGO follow the money...

    Senator Dr. Scott Jensen told reporters that he received a document coaching him to fill out death certificates with a Covid-19 diagnosis without lab confirmation. That the AMA was promoting this.

    He told Laura Ingraham that Medicare is giving $13,000 to the hospital for each Covid-19 patient and if that patient goes on a vent $39,000. Could that be why they wanted vents so bad?

    If true, I wonder if this in any way reduces the billing to the patient/patient's insurer or is even admitted. I think I can guess the answer to that
     

    Alpo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    13,877
    113
    Indy Metro Area
    Under the 'am I paranoid enough' rubric, an somewhat crazy idea keeps nibbling at my mind. What if the left is taking a lesson from history, the lesson that it took a complete shattering of the economy and hard times for almnost everybody in order to make sweeping changes towards socialism. Specifically electing FDR as some sort of savior and allowing him to make changes so radical he wanted to pack the supreme court in order to get his way. Since many things they want to do would seem aimed at making the problems worse, perhaps they've concluded they need a similar level of crisis to get progressivism progressing again. I don't see Trump playing Hoover, though

    I don't think he actually has that much influence directly, but Soros is amoral enough to function as a sort of Dr Strangelove for the movement. Don't know who might be the Blofeld

    On occasion, during the day or late at night, I think of how reality took a jog step in March 2020. There is no going back to normal from this point on. Behavior will change. There are a few obvious big things, like crowded arenas and stadiums, or the end of the densely packed jumbo jet. And then there are the little changes. Shaking hands, accepting cash in lieu of a swept iPhone app or plastic.

    The change list is large. And those are only the first-order effects. Who knows where the iterations can possibly end?

    All this is to say, I don't think we will see an organized conspiracy of the left. Media-intensified fear is already gurgling in the bowels of those who have previously only known safety. Post-2020 civilization became less free last month. There is no unwinding that watch.
     
    Last edited:

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    17,836
    113
    So you are still open for business but no one is showing up?

    Wouldn't that mean the government order is adversely affecting you and give you grounds for legal action?

    You’re evidently out of touch with reality. Number ONE, I didn’t cave, business STOPPED, no money to pay for services, equals no services. Number two sue who, the government, with what no business means NO money. Number three, even if there were money for two, courts aren’t operating for anything other than the most pressing matters. A small business owner suing the .gov isn’t that. I’ve been out everyday looking to keep my business running, but everyday, more potential customers and current customers close, some for good. Those who are still getting paid for their essential work, will find those jobs drying up soon as well, this cannot go on much longer or we’ll see a Depression FAR worse than The Great Depression.
     

    Twangbanger

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Oct 9, 2010
    7,137
    113
    So it's not just me noticing the scarves.

    I have noticed this about a great many Washington D.C. "Professional Women." It's a regional-beehive sort of style statement that seems to go back a few years. A girl I went to HS with who is up there now, is a "Scarf Gal." There seems to be a certain level of stature that goes with it, as in like "Agency Head" or "Deputy Assistant Something Or Other." The Female Code doesn't seem to allow young beta females to do it. (Or maybe they just aren't old enough to have turkey neck yet?). It's difficult of course for us Cro-Magnon males to decipher female pecking-orders. But in a town famous for employing large numbers of faceless interns, The Scarf seems to carry a small whiff of, "I am _not_ an office girl staffer like these females you see standing behind me."

    Very few indeed have ascended to the level of the Hillary Pantsuit yet, though.
     
    Last edited:

    JettaKnight

    Я з Україною
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Oct 13, 2010
    26,750
    113
    Fort Wayne
    I have noticed this about a great many Washington D.C. "Professional Women." It's a regional-beehive sort of style statement that seems to go back there a few years. A girl I went to HS with who is up there now, is a "Scarf Gal." There seems to be a certain level of stature that goes with it, as in like "Agency Head" or "Deputy Assistant Something Or Other." The Female Code doesn't seem to allow young beta females to do it. (Or maybe they just aren't old enough to have turkey neck yet?).

    Very few indeed have ascended to the level of the Hillary Pantsuit yet, though.

    I really thought scarves were strictly for female evangelical worship singers post 2018. I'm pretty sure every hipster threw them away in 2017.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom