Agreed.It's a free country, and people should be able to display a confederate flag if they please. I'm also free to have the opinion that anyone flying that flag is not a friend of mine and not someone that I'd ever associate with.
Also, agreed. For some maybe the connection isn't there.That flag, like it or not, has racial connotations.
Not only that, the South lost that war. You don't see the Nazi flag being flown in Germany by people wanting to display their heritage. When you lose, your flag should be abolished.
I have to disagree on this.
There was no nobility, culture or history with Naziism. It was a dark, dark smudge on the German people - one they desperately want to forget, yet know they must never forget it. Naziism rose and fell relatively quickly and for the most part revolved around one man.
The CSA, however is much more complex and not nearly as evil. It's history and lead up is far longer and the roots of it origins are far deeper and more spread out.
I think like every internet comparison, it's unfair to compare this to Naziism. That's why I didn't mention it in my post.
They both ultimately failed on the battlefield. That's about as far as you can take the analogy.
Any flag of the CSA should be flown in limited capacity and in an environment of remembrance - e.g. a cemetery or a memorial. Definately not in a front yard, the back of a pickup truck or a position of authority like a capital building. Doubly so given the fact that the "flag was lowered" some 150 years ago.
EDIT: Tripply so for flying the flag outside of former CSA territory.
I'm trying to think of a good comparison, and the best I can come up with is flying the flag of Rhodesia. It's a failed state, it was centered around moral evils, it's no where near us, none of us were there...
Did Genghis Khan have a flag? The Canaanites?
Last edited: