To HoughMade,
I will not be one to argue that lawyers should or should not go to college. My only argument is that a college degree is, as I believe I demonstrated, not a reasonable requirement to the practice of law. What I believe is necessary to the practice of law is the ability of one seeking gainful employment there to prove their knowledge and understanding of the legal process and foundations of our legal system. A degree is simply not required for this.
Is a degree useful? Absolutely! Does a degree provide a benchmark for measuring someones acumen for understanding most of the aspects of the legal system? Yes 100%. BUT, is it necessary to successfully maneuver in the terrain of courts and the legal system? Not necessarily, in my opinion.
A good friend of mine got his masters degree in accounting. Ask him what he learned and he will tell you nothing! He knew as much before getting the degree by owning his own accounting office with his bachelors as he now does with his masters. Ask him why he got it and he will tell you it does generate more business from some clients who think it is necessary for their accountant to have a masters degree, the very degree he finds contributed nothing to his working knowledge. He simply acknowledges that with the MA he makes more money than without it due to the perception of some clients.
On an off tangent I will comment that a place I believe we are failing miserably is in apprenticeship programs being respected and honored in America. Our culture values a college degree but looks down on job skills without which we would come to a grinding halt! We need a better respect for electricians, carpenters, mechanics, plumbers, HVAC and all manually skilled jobs. Regrettably I don't see our culture showing the same deferential respect for the trades as it does for the degrees. I remember listening to an interview with a German businessman who wanted to build an auto plant in America but he was reluctant to do so because he had no guarantee of a trained workforce that be able to move into skilled, non college degree jobs to keep the plant running. America is either "college" or "menial" without a respected third choice. It seems that in Germany there is a great deal of respect for the trade unions and their members who make things work. Here in America our culture has lowered its respect toward those skills which are essential to maintaining our infrastructure. Only within the unions is there a significant respect for specialized trades and their status has fallen significantly over the last many decades.
I will go back to my main point that too many companies fail to logically analyze a job description and leave emotion out of it. They insert a "college degree" requirement where they should be looking for a skills requirement. If that job does indeed require some formalized college training - fine! All too often laziness or hubris or ego shoves in a college requirement where it just ain't so.
Regards,
Doug
Some body please rep this person ( im all out ) This is very well the truth - with out the trades , we have no work force . If only corporation's could understand this .To HoughMade,
I will not be one to argue that lawyers should or should not go to college. My only argument is that a college degree is, as I believe I demonstrated, not a reasonable requirement to the practice of law. What I believe is necessary to the practice of law is the ability of one seeking gainful employment there to prove their knowledge and understanding of the legal process and foundations of our legal system. A degree is simply not required for this.
Is a degree useful? Absolutely! Does a degree provide a benchmark for measuring someones acumen for understanding most of the aspects of the legal system? Yes 100%. BUT, is it necessary to successfully maneuver in the terrain of courts and the legal system? Not necessarily, in my opinion.
A good friend of mine got his masters degree in accounting. Ask him what he learned and he will tell you nothing! He knew as much before getting the degree by owning his own accounting office with his bachelors as he now does with his masters. Ask him why he got it and he will tell you it does generate more business from some clients who think it is necessary for their accountant to have a masters degree, the very degree he finds contributed nothing to his working knowledge. He simply acknowledges that with the MA he makes more money than without it due to the perception of some clients.
On an off tangent I will comment that a place I believe we are failing miserably is in apprenticeship programs being respected and honored in America. Our culture values a college degree but looks down on job skills without which we would come to a grinding halt! We need a better respect for electricians, carpenters, mechanics, plumbers, HVAC and all manually skilled jobs. Regrettably I don't see our culture showing the same deferential respect for the trades as it does for the degrees. I remember listening to an interview with a German businessman who wanted to build an auto plant in America but he was reluctant to do so because he had no guarantee of a trained workforce that be able to move into skilled, non college degree jobs to keep the plant running. America is either "college" or "menial" without a respected third choice. It seems that in Germany there is a great deal of respect for the trade unions and their members who make things work. Here in America our culture has lowered its respect toward those skills which are essential to maintaining our infrastructure. Only within the unions is there a significant respect for specialized trades and their status has fallen significantly over the last many decades.
I will go back to my main point that too many companies fail to logically analyze a job description and leave emotion out of it. They insert a "college degree" requirement where they should be looking for a skills requirement. If that job does indeed require some formalized college training - fine! All too often laziness or hubris or ego shoves in a college requirement where it just ain't so.
Regards,
Doug
My son wants to be a lawyer. I told him I'd disown him if I see his face plastered on TARC busses with some cheezy slogan like "the heavy hitter".I would be fine with the return of the apprenticeship model in legal education, but it is not going to happen for a variety of reasons (some, market based). Anyone who wants to become a lawyer and has the intelligence to do it, can. Does the system need to be what it is? No, but it isn't the barrier to entry some imagine it to be.
I would be fine with the return of the apprenticeship model in legal education, but it is not going to happen for a variety of reasons (some, market based). Anyone who wants to become a lawyer and has the intelligence to do it, can. Does the system need to be what it is? No, but it isn't the barrier to entry some imagine it to be.
Some body please rep this person ( im all out ) This is very well the truth - with out the trades , we have no work force . If only corporation's could understand this .
My son wants to be a lawyer. I told him I'd disown him if I see his face plastered on TARC busses with some cheezy slogan like "the heavy hitter".
As would I. Plaintiff's personal injury with your face everywhere is where the money is, but it's not for me.
I don't have a problem with it unless they come up to me while I'm doing my job and try to explain what I'm doing wrong when it's obvious they have no clue what they're talking about.