Child Murders in the UK Spark Anti-Immigration Riots

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Lmo1131

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 11, 2020
    594
    93
    east of the Pacific
    More muslim BS in England.

    I read a book back in the late 90s', "Slavery, Terrorism, and Islam", by author Peter Hammond. He had/has a pretty clear view of what was starting to happen then, and what is transpiring now.

    V V V It's long, but read it V V V

    Their takeover of a country, what Dr. Hammond refers to as “Islamization,” begins when the population of Muslims reaches a critical mass, and they being to agitate for various privileges.

    When the Muslim population remains under 2% in a country, they will be seen primarily as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the current situation in:

    United States — Muslim 0.6%

    Australia — Muslim 1.5%

    Canada — Muslim 1.9%

    China — Muslim 1.8%

    Italy — Muslim 1.5%

    Norway — Muslim 1.8%

    As the Muslim population reaches 2% to 5%, they begin to recruit from ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, within prisons and street gangs. This is happening in:

    Denmark — Muslim 2%

    Germany — Muslim 3.7%

    United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%

    Spain — Muslim 4%

    Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

    From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population,” Dr. Hammond notes. “For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food” and increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature such food on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is happening in:

    France — Muslim 8%

    Philippines — 5%

    Sweden — Muslim 5%

    Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%

    The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%

    Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

    Soon they begin to apply pressure to allow Sharia law within their own communities (sometimes ghettos).

    When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions,” Dr. Hammond notes. “In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam.” These tensions are seen on a regular basis in:

    Guyana — Muslim 10%

    India — Muslim 13.4%

    Israel — Muslim 16%

    Kenya — Muslim 10%

    Russia — Muslim 15%

    The violence increases when the Muslim population reaches 20%. “After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues,” such as in:

    Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

    “At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare,” such as in:

    Bosnia — Muslim 40%

    Chad — Muslim 53.1%

    Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

    From 60%, persecution of non-believing “infidels” rises significantly, including sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia law as a weapon, and Jizya, a tax placed on infidels, such as in:

    Albania — Muslim 70%

    Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%

    Qatar — Muslim 77.5%

    Sudan — Muslim 70%

    After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out “infidels,” and move toward a 100% Muslim society, which has been experienced to some degree in:

    Bangladesh — Muslim 83%

    Egypt — Muslim 90%

    Gaza — Muslim 98.7%

    Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%

    Iran — Muslim 98%

    Iraq — Muslim 97%

    Jordan — Muslim 92%

    Morocco — Muslim 98.7%

    Pakistan — Muslim 97%

    Palestine — Muslim 99%

    Syria — Muslim 90%

    Tajikistan — Muslim 90%

    Turkey — Muslim 99.8%

    United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

    A 100% Muslim society will theoretically usher in their version of peace — the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. “Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrassas are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word,” such as in:

    Afghanistan — Muslim 100%

    Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%

    Somalia — Muslim 100%

    Yemen — Muslim 100%

    Dr. Hammond observes this Islamic ideal is seldom realized. “Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.”

    “It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia law,” he states.

    Dr. Hammond is also concerned by demographic trends. “Today’s 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world’s population,” he observes. “But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world’s population by the end of this century.”
     
    Last edited:

    BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    20,827
    149
    1,000 yards out

    BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    20,827
    149
    1,000 yards out
    Looks like they need some common sense stick control over there

    Thank God there was a bystander....armed with a camera on his cellphone.

    Query:
    Were this to happen in Indiana and a law abiding bystander armed with a sidearm dispatched one or more of these attackers, wouldn't it be a legal shoot?
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    95,224
    113
    Merrillville
    Thank God there was a bystander....armed with a camera on his cellphone.

    Query:
    Were this to happen in Indiana and a law abiding bystander armed with a sidearm dispatched one or more of these attackers, wouldn't it be a legal shoot?
    You need to demonstrate that an "average" person would be in fear of their life, or "serious" bodily harm.
    Then you have to worry about the government officials... and citizens.

    As usual, the gun should be a "last resort".
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    33,198
    77
    Camby area
    Thank God there was a bystander....armed with a camera on his cellphone.

    Query:
    Were this to happen in Indiana and a law abiding bystander armed with a sidearm dispatched one or more of these attackers, wouldn't it be a legal shoot?
    Can you articulate a legitimate fear for the victim's life or risk of serious bodily injury? Then probably yes. (remember, IANAL)
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    95,224
    113
    Merrillville
    Hmmmmm Let me look at that clip again where a gang of thugs is beating a guy on the ground with sticks.

    And think about what city you may be in.. and the anti-gun bias of a jury pool.
    Many of the jury have not been in a fight, or a life threatening situation.
    They get their ideas of defense from Hollywood.
    They are sitting in a climate controlled room, where they can take their time to try to think something over.
    They are not in a life threatening (to them) situation.
     

    BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    20,827
    149
    1,000 yards out
    And think about what city you may be in.. and the anti-gun bias of a jury pool.
    Many of the jury have not been in a fight, or a life threatening situation.
    They get their ideas of defense from Hollywood.
    They are sitting in a climate controlled room, where they can take their time to try to think something over.
    They are not in a life threatening (to them) situation.

    Meh...I'll just pass. Let the guy get the **** kicked out of him. Guess he should have armed himself.

    Honestly, my priorities are my loved ones, my property, and me. The rest, not so much.

    I'll have to pull the code later.
     

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    530,581
    Messages
    9,953,667
    Members
    54,881
    Latest member
    Z06
    Top Bottom