\There seems to be an unwritten law on the gun-related Internet saying, “If you carry less than I do, you’re a pathetic ‘sheeple,’ and if you carry more than I do, you’re a paranoid mall ninja.” Forgive me if I can’t buy into either of those attitudes.
Off duty, G19 or M&P 40 with two spares, for a total of 46 rounds. On duty, M&P 40 with three spares, for a total of 61.
Ok, I understand this. A round chambered and full mag. That's actually they way I carry mostly, although a double stack 9mm for a total of 16.1911 1 in tube,
Got it.3-8 round mags
Ok, lost me here - unless your backup gun is a double barrel shotgun.and bug with 2 in tube
Hey - real bad things happen to paranoid people sometimes, too.Paranoid.
The dangers of being a gun article writer. You have to have something to say every time an article is due, and there isn't that much to say. Look, another spin on "is your j-frame enough?"
Interesting take-away, and maybe not invalid...there is a lot of drivel out there. But I have to ask, given the convenient anonymity of the internet that allows you to say whatever you wish about whomever you wish:
How many offers have you turned down to go be a writer yourself?
-Nate
I think it boils down to "why wouldn't you carry more?" I generally carry at 16+1 with a 19 backup. As always, I pray I never even need one.
I suppose my point was that despite your comment, and certainly the reality that there are a lot of recycled stories in 'modern' gun rags, Massad presented some valid points and DID reach some new audience (the audience is ever-growing, ever-changing, dontchaknow?).
If you want to get philosophical about it, likely as not, there is never anything truly new to discuss. But since we live for a finite amount of time, and most of us stay interested in any one topic for a likewise-finite amount of time, the forum/rag/gunshop is conveniently (for their survival anyway...) presented a new audience all the time.
Your previous post sounds mostly like you were complaining about how Mas interpreted things differently than you would have if you were the one in his shoes (but your points--no matter their validity--still didn't disagree with the main tenet of his article), and/or that you are complaining about being one of those of us that think we have read all we can ever learn from a gun writer.
Sorry if that interpretation is incorrect, but that's how it comes across.
-Nate
So why don't you carry more?
Some of us have the luxury of carrying larger, higher capacity guns. Some of us work in places we'd be fired if discovered to be carrying and with dress codes or physical activity that makes concealment more challenging. Women's fashion in particular is challenging for concealed carry without resorting to off body/purse carry. There are also distinct advantages to a small gun that is pocket carried when it comes to street robberies.