Seems to me that you get the gist of it. Like many antigunners they'd rather see a woman raped and murdered than defend herself with a gun.I guess I don't get the point. Are they trying to say it's better to be raped because it only lasts 30 seconds? So somehow it's better to be defenseless?
Not sure they don't share the sentiment. It's certainly in their bailiwick.You were Perazzi'd, Mr. J.
That is what they're saying. In their mind, they're right.I guess I don't get the point. Are they trying to say it's better to be raped because it only lasts 30 seconds? So somehow it's better to be defenseless?
For all you nay-sayers, I bring evidence of it being real. I rarely post here on INGO but seeing as I was there I feel the need to speak. There are several screenshots of when it was post but one stands out.
imgur: the simple image sharer
I was browsing another gun forum several months ago and rememver when this happened. We all thought it was a joke or post by someone else. Sure enough going to the Brady Campaign FB page showed it to be legit. They took it down after only an hour or so if i remember right. People were outraged that it was post and the Brady Campaign page admins tried in vain to blame it on someone posting it to their page, even with it clearly being post by the page owner.
It's been called "fake" by Snopes, but if you read the Snopes article it is one of the weakest rebuttals you'll see on the site. Basically "we asked the Brady Campaign and they said they didn't post it. So we believed them."
It might be fake, it might have been posted by them and then removed. It certainly echoes their public sentiments pretty well.
Why are some of you so quick to believe fake stuff like this? No political campaign party would ever post anything like this -- not with the obvious undertone like this has.
Be better than the fools who do this on both sides of the fence. Be smarter.