I have been shooting a 92 in various versions for many years. Please tell me what issues I might have?
If you are thinking about the couple of slides the government broke, be advised the ammo that they were using was a very highly overloaded round normally used in a machine gun and not a handgun.
If you are thinking about the mag issues when our great troops took them into the sandbox, be advised that the company that made those mags did not make them to Beretta spec, and because of the rough finish inside the mag, they proved to be a problem. It was not the pistol.
So using properly loaded ammo, and Beretta factory, MDS, or Mec-gar mags, what issues do I need to worry about.
Thanks.
To MarkM, the info provided by soljah777 is a great resource, and in truth, as you can see, only the markings and a very subtle difference in the frame differentiate the M9 from the 92FS. Both are very good pistols.
"Go over to Premier Arms right there in Brownsburg. "
I'm always in there I know that they have a 96 but I want the 9mm. And the only other ones I saw were the taurus knock offs.
Personally my M9 while in Iraq and Afghanistan never left the arms room for a reason.. it never worked.. get rid of that nickeled plated pimp **** and get a M&P! Save you some money and get a much better pistol..
there much better.
... As for the Taurus version I was thinking about the PT101 but then I remembered what my dad told me" if you're going to buy a gun buy a GOOD gun." ...
I'm looking into one for a primary carry gun. As for concealmeant I'm also looking for a 380 as a backup/CCW. As for the Taurus version I was thinking about the PT101 but then I remembered what my dad told me" if you're going to buy a gun buy a GOOD gun." At the time I was carrying a Rossi. As for all the stores I can't buy from one I'm only 19.