AR-15 in .300BLK (300 Blackout)

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • esrice

    Certified Regular Guy
    Rating - 100%
    20   0   0
    Jan 16, 2008
    24,095
    48
    Indy
    I believe noveske shortest is an 8 inch in 300BLK if im not mistaken,

    Yeah just go 8". . . .

    :drool:

    8-300_1.jpg
     

    jblomenberg16

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    67   0   0
    Mar 13, 2008
    9,920
    63
    Southern Indiana
    Why not just get a 7.62x39 upper if the ballistics are similar?


    1) 7.62x39 requires a unique bolt; .300 blackout uses the same bolt as the 5.56 / .223.

    2) 7.62x39 requires unique magazines; .300 blackout uses standard 5.56 mags

    3) 7.62x39 has a limited selection of bullets (.311 diameter) to use for the folks that reload; .300 blackout uses standard .308 bullets.


    #1 and #2 alone are the biggest reasons, and #3 is the icing on the cake.
     

    Clay

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 98.8%
    81   1   0
    Aug 28, 2008
    9,648
    48
    Vigo Co
    7.62x39 ARs aren't known for their reliability either IIRC, which goes back to the funky mags and feeding issues more than anything.
     

    Hop

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Jan 21, 2008
    5,108
    83
    Indy
    Does an 8" 300 BLK Noveske still give you enough velocity to knock some stuff down if shooting supersonic? I want it to beat the energy from a 5.56 round 100-300 yards downrange if needed.
     

    jblomenberg16

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    67   0   0
    Mar 13, 2008
    9,920
    63
    Southern Indiana
    Does an 8" 300 BLK Noveske still give you enough velocity to knock some stuff down if shooting supersonic? I want it to beat the energy from a 5.56 round 100-300 yards downrange if needed.


    Very rough numbers based on some bullets I had in my database. These are not exact since I haven't actually done any load development to confrim, so just rough "hypothetical" comparison

    Subsonic 220gr with a 1000FPS muzzle velocity.

    Energy@
    muzzle: 488 lb-ft
    100yd: 453
    200yd: 423
    300yd: 397


    Supersonic 110gr with a 1900 FPS muzzle velocity (rough swag of what yo might get from an 8" barrel)

    Energy@
    muzzle: 882 lb-ft
    100yd: 756
    200yd: 646
    300yd: 550



    Compared to standard M193 Ball (55gr) @ 3000 FPS from a 16" barrel (again rough number to make the math easy)

    Energy@
    muzzle: 1099 lb-ft
    100yd: 845
    200yd: 641
    300yd: 477




    So, to answer your question, the 5.56 makes up for its light projectile with velocity. Since the equation for energy is 1/2*m*v^2, the velocity component does more for you than the mass component.

    Supersonic .300BLK is certainly no slouch, and would do the trick, but won't have the same "Knock down" energy of a full power 5.56 round.
     

    Tombs

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    12,294
    113
    Martinsville
    I'd be interested in one if they could get the velocity up and get it to shoot a little flatter out to longer ranges in "bulk grade" ammunition.

    I don't care how light they have to make the projectile to do it, if they can get some better long range performance out of it. Until then the 6.8 keeps looking more and more attractive. Hell, you can go pretty heavy on it if you need to for suppressed applications as well.

    Logistically speaking, I know why they did the blackout the way they did, the numbers just don't do much for me, even though I ohh and ahh at the round on a regular basis.
     

    Redneckbuckeye

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Oct 19, 2009
    159
    16
    Sheridan
    1) 7.62x39 requires a unique bolt; .300 blackout uses the same bolt as the 5.56 / .223.

    2) 7.62x39 requires unique magazines; .300 blackout uses standard 5.56 mags

    3) 7.62x39 has a limited selection of bullets (.311 diameter) to use for the folks that reload; .300 blackout uses standard .308 bullets.


    #1 and #2 alone are the biggest reasons, and #3 is the icing on the cake.


    Mags are cheap/ relatively, sounds like most of you are building dedicated uppers anyway as far as the bolt goes....cheaper ammo, cheaper upper, some manufacturers have fixed the mag feeding issues, seems like it makes more sense to me.
     

    jblomenberg16

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    67   0   0
    Mar 13, 2008
    9,920
    63
    Southern Indiana
    Picture of my new baby. Broke it in Yesterday.
    .
    DSC00023.jpg


    Upper is a 16" CMMG. Lower is Spikes, VLTOR stock, MOE + etc. Shoots very well, and I'm really digging the CMMG handguard. It is very thin and light weight, and has rail sections that can be moved to multiple locations on the handguard to suit.
     

    pierce195

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    54   0   0
    Mar 21, 2008
    797
    28
    New Castle
    Picture of my new baby. Broke it in Yesterday.
    .
    DSC00023.jpg


    Upper is a 16" CMMG. Lower is Spikes, VLTOR stock, MOE + etc. Shoots very well, and I'm really digging the CMMG handguard. It is very thin and light weight, and has rail sections that can be moved to multiple locations on the handguard to suit.

    Nice looking rifle, what happened to the short barrel?
     

    malern28us

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Dec 26, 2009
    2,025
    38
    Huntington, Indiana
    1) 7.62x39 requires a unique bolt; .300 blackout uses the same bolt as the 5.56 / .223.

    2) 7.62x39 requires unique magazines; .300 blackout uses standard 5.56 mags

    3) 7.62x39 has a limited selection of bullets (.311 diameter) to use for the folks that reload; .300 blackout uses standard .308 bullets.


    #1 and #2 alone are the biggest reasons, and #3 is the icing on the cake.

    I guess if I was on a "super secret" mission this would be icing as you say. The cold hard truth is you arent gonna carry both a 5.56 and 300 BLK upper and ammo with you if you ever "have" to use them. Looks like there isn't really any advantage. The ammo price difference speaks volumes.
     
    Top Bottom