I place too much value on human life to allow an addict to commit suicide, while I hold something that will save him/ her in my hand. In my way of thinking there is a lot of difference in that and allowing someone to pass because his body isn't naturally up to the task of keeping him alive without extraordinary medical procedures.I've had some ideas rolling around in my head on this, and I'm not sure they are ready to express. But maybe I'll beta test one.
First of all, we know that the condition you are describing exists under the current policy of criminalization. Calling for more of the same must be recognized as foolhardy.
I'm thinking an addict could go to the local hospital and basically inform them he wishes to be DNR. He gets an ID or some such, and as long as he has it on him and the cops or emt's see it, they don't give the OD any Narcan. If you don't opt into that program, then you are legally obligated for all expenses related to your OD, including a mandatory rehab. Since so many addicts are poor, they will be offered work with a sponsor organization. That organization could be a business or charity, or possibly menial labor for a state agency wishing to participate. Offer tax incentives to sponsor businesses. Routine random drug tests will be administered, and a failure will result in consequences [haven't thought that part out, maybe they never leave the supervision of the rehab facility]. Upon payment of your debt, the sponsor has the option to employ you full time, or let you go, with or without a letter of recommendation. This will be costly, and must be in lieu of enforcement programs, not in addition to them.
I place too much value on human life to allow an addict to commit suicide, while I hold something that will save him/ her in my hand. In my way of thinking there is a lot of difference in that and allowing someone to pass because his body isn't naturally up to the task of keeping him alive without extraordinary medical procedures.
I didn't have to support it. It is the status quo. You want change. Fine. Where is your evidence?
As I said before, the present system isn't working well, but I don't have any suggested changes. You seem to be all-fired up about your approach. Where are the facts supporting your conclusions?
You've not been paying attention. Facts have been discussed in here. At front and center is the complete failure of our current system.
So you are willing to accept a very broken, very inhumane status quo. And you require nothing to convince you to accept that. "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds."
I support filing prohibition under "still can't get it to work" and pursuing other options.
If the war on drugs had only been a failure, it wouldn't be nearly as bad, but it created new problems with larger and more widespread consequences for us all.
Genius is not required to see that it only exists to entrench the State monopoly of force and control at the expense of the people.
Au contraire. I have been paying attention. Show me where else in the world where your proposal has worked, and worked well. You are stubbornly promoting a position without facts. Citations, please.
You speak of "other options", which means you don't have a concrete proposal with evidence of the likelihood of success.
My answer is abstinence. We know that works. It is successful and documented.
You have not shown any data to support your "solution".
I'm out of here. It has become cyclical.
My answer is abstinence. We know that works...
Yes, that's what we're saying. Abstain from the war on drugs.
Everything got worse when we started using wars as an escape from reality.
Yes, that's what we're saying. Abstain from the war on drugs.
Everything got worse when we started using wars as an escape from reality.
So the Lord God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s ribs[g] and then closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib[h] he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.
It started here. (Alpo 1, ATM 0)
Hmm. The narcotic of government?
It was that sickening feeling you got as you foundered.
But, there are plenty who seek your approbation. I have never been in that tribe.
Speaking of interesting. You know what would be fascinating? Any kind of evidence the humanitarian crisis we are creating with the War on Drugs is doing anything significant to achieve its stated aim.