My mini-14 tactical wanted to come out and play with the commies.That's a nice "AK" on the far right.
I've been tossing around the idea of picking up a Draco but just haven't convinced myself it's worth the money. I think it would look nice sitting next to my under folder AK and since it shoots the same round that's a bonus. I've also been looking at AR's but there so expensive...I think I'd rather throw my money into a SIG 556R that way I don't have to stock up on multiple calibers.
It already is.Will the AK ever be as accurate as the AR - probably not.
You can say that again.I love my AK......it was one of my first firearms and one that stays off the table when considering trades. I dont see anything wrong with the AR, I just like the way my AK looks and the fact I know it will always go "bang"!
i need to get me another ak, never had any problems with it. Do you guys have a lot of issues with your ar's? If shtf i think i would gladly take either.
It is an "image" thing for me. I've owned an AK, SKS, and a few AR's. I sold my AK and SKS years ago. I love the look of a straight up AK with ALL wood furniture. I hate the plastic look on an AK, even the plastic grip that the WASR guns come with.
That being said, since 9/11, I can't get past the "image" that an AK represents. Every time I see one, I picture piece of sh*t terrorists holding it and it just has ruined the look of what I once thought was a beautiful gun. I know it isn't the gun's fault, as it is truly a nice simple firearm. I also know that allies and other good guys fight with them in the name of Peace. But it is just a terrorist image that I hate that fills my head anymore.
AR's just represent the US Military in my mind. Good men and women putting it all on the line every day. Freedom in an F-ed up world. I'm on an AR buying binge lately too, so that my sway my current state of mind.
Having owned a myriad of AKs and a Saiga, they CAN be the equal of an AR with skill.
Example: I had an Arsenal SLR016FR. With a Millet DMS1 on the top and handloaded 75gr .223, it COULD get MOA (yes, 1" at 100 yards). But VERY slow fire.
I currently have a Yugo SKS that with the gas shut off, handloaded ammo, I can get 1.5-2 MOA ALL DAY.
Had a WASR that could do 2 MOA with a decent telescopic. Garbage ammo too. But slowfire and no caffine.
Given how I see alot of AR guys shoot (competition and varmint shooters do not apply), off hand, 100 yards, irons or telescopic, they are the same rifle. I have a strong belief that AKs get a bad rap as the market is flooded with garbage ones (CIA WASRs) in terms of accuracy and fitment, but also that most folks that buy an AK want a rifle they will put a mag through every year and that's it : Read: NON SHOOTERS. Their lower cost makes them attractive to folks that may not have a lot of skill or want to shoot very much. Nothing wrong with that.
Offhand shooting, not bench, I firmly believe the AK will do fine with average shooters. Trained shooters, alot better, but the AR still has the accuracy edge. Cost is where it's at: Pay $1K for an AK or an AR, you are getting a fine rifle.