A sad day

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 5, 2011
    3,530
    48
    You would think that the Pledge of Allegiance would be one thing that would be fairly controversy free....but not on INGO, oh no....rather than being something we can basically agree on, we have to get on our hobbyhorses about that too. Honestly, it seems like some people just never turn off their "I'm so much smarter and more informed than you" switch.

    Look into what a pledge of allegiance is actually for, sometime. It's amazing to look at the psychology behind something so simple. Realize for a moment that if 1892 was the first instance of a pledge then the time before that (1776-1891) were filled with Americans who needed none, or else saw no need for a recognized, national pledge. Americans who, I might add, were a sight closer to actual liberty than people in 1892 or 2013.
     
    Top Bottom