17 squirrel
Shooter
- May 15, 2013
- 4,427
- 63
Hell, I gun in your hand is illegal in some places. This would come in handy for military use I bet.Yeah, I'm betting a gun on a drone is probably illegal.
Hell, I gun in your hand is illegal in some places. This would come in handy for military use I bet.
Now INGO can have a whole new argument. Should you OC or CC on your drone?Probably. I figure if you can put weapons on your private plane, a drone isn't much difference.
As is always the case, military weapons (in this case, a weaponized "drone") eventually make it into the civilian space.
Then replace remote control with autonomous control, and we have the beginning of SkyNet!
Yeah, I'm betting a gun on a drone is probably illegal.
I was thinking the same thing. Those are small rotors for supporting a semi-auto. Another reason I call fake is the location of the gun. It would unbalance that drone terribly. There are no components even remotely that heavy on a drone you could put on the other side to balance it. That drone has all its components centered.I fly drowns.
There is not a quad or hex drown that can handle the recoil on the Civilian market.
Looking at the size of the drown. I dough very much that it could lift the weight of a handgun.
If you look very closely. The flashes are photo shopped in.
For anybody even considering that option. Electro-mechanical trigger actuators are not illegal by themselves as long as 1 push of the button only results in a single pull of the trigger. As soon as you do something that permits multiple trigger pulls on the gun for a single "action" in the user's hands you've made an unregistered machinegun...If they want to hook a semi auto up to a small motor and a cam to make it full auto it could be done too.
By what reasoning? AOW's typically fall into the AOW category because they are A) disguised to not look like a firearm, or B) don't fit any of the other weapon categories (machinegun, silencer, rifle, pistol, shotgun, DD). I don't see how attaching a firearm (rifle or handgun) would change it's classification into an AOW.Like I said. Wouldn't that be an AOW (Any Other Weapon) under NFA? Like a James Bond briefcase gun or the wrong wallet holster for your .380
For anybody even considering that option. Electro-mechanical trigger actuators are not illegal by themselves as long as 1 push of the button only results in a single pull of the trigger. As soon as you do something that permits multiple trigger pulls on the gun for a single "action" in the user's hands you've made an unregistered machinegun...
isn't there a law about remote firing devices as well?
I fly drowns.
There is not a quad or hex drown that can handle the recoil on the Civilian market.
Looking at the size of the drown. I dough very much that it could lift the weight of a handgun.
If you look very closely. The flashes are photo shopped in.
isn't there a law about remote firing devices as well?