BehindBlueI's
Grandmaster
- Oct 3, 2012
- 26,608
- 113
I interviewed a guy on a robbery recently, and he stated his motive was money for crack cocaine. This isn't unusual. What was someone unusual is he had a pending cocaine possession charge when I talked to him...and he was disappointed with the legislature for downgrading the offense. He said higher sentences should be attached to crack and heroin because of how much crime they cause and because harsher penalties would keep more people from doing drugs. I figured I'd delve into that a bit for my own curiosity, as we'd already covered the robbery pretty well.
I asked him the longest he'd ever been clean while "out". He said 10 months. Reason? Impending death of a family member, so he wanted to be out of jail for the passing and the funeral. Then 2 months after getting out the last time.
So, I ask, the harsher penalties didn't keep you from using crack again.
Yes they did, for two months, he answered.
It felt a bit odd to be the cop arguing that longer drug sentences were useless to prevent drug use and the crack addict arguing they should be stiffer and he's disappointed in the legislature for not taking crack more serious.
So I asked him what would be the best thing to help him not reoffend and his answers were:
1) Reunite with my family
2) Home detention instead of work release, work release is where all the drugs are
3) Better drug treatment counseling in prison
Note that even after telling me how the penalties mattered, when asked to list things that would help him not reoffend, penalties weren't there. He knew he screwed his life up by becoming addicted to crack, that his other crimes stem from that, and that if he could get off crack he'd have a chance at a straight life...but that his odds of doing so were slim. It was actually pretty damn sad. One stupid decision very early in his life...a life time of very real consequences.
I asked him the longest he'd ever been clean while "out". He said 10 months. Reason? Impending death of a family member, so he wanted to be out of jail for the passing and the funeral. Then 2 months after getting out the last time.
So, I ask, the harsher penalties didn't keep you from using crack again.
Yes they did, for two months, he answered.
It felt a bit odd to be the cop arguing that longer drug sentences were useless to prevent drug use and the crack addict arguing they should be stiffer and he's disappointed in the legislature for not taking crack more serious.
So I asked him what would be the best thing to help him not reoffend and his answers were:
1) Reunite with my family
2) Home detention instead of work release, work release is where all the drugs are
3) Better drug treatment counseling in prison
Note that even after telling me how the penalties mattered, when asked to list things that would help him not reoffend, penalties weren't there. He knew he screwed his life up by becoming addicted to crack, that his other crimes stem from that, and that if he could get off crack he'd have a chance at a straight life...but that his odds of doing so were slim. It was actually pretty damn sad. One stupid decision very early in his life...a life time of very real consequences.