7th Circuit Upholds Warrantless Entry to Seize Gun

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    52,060
    113
    Mitchell
    When police are acting under the emergency aid doctrine, the court found, a search warrant, even if there's time to get one, may not be relevant because there is no suspicion of criminal activity.

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    I don't think I can read between the lines well enough to see where a warrant is required only when criminal activity is suspected. You have to be careful of what you say when you're talking to doctors.
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    26,608
    113
    What's new? When was a suicidal person with the means to commit suicide not an exigent circumstance? When you tell your doctor you might as well blow your brains out, he may go ahead and take you seriously.

    In Indiana, we don't get a warrant for mental health issues. You get a mental writ, which is a lot more complicated to get than a warrant, requiring doctors' signatures and a judge's signature.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Oh crap. A panel of Flaum, Manion, and Rovner? That spelled doom for anything RKBA anyway.

    A tortured 74 page opinion with an apologetic concurrence by Manion? Of course.

    Having said that, it probably is the right answer under existing precedent. <=== notice formatting emphasis

    The reality is that in a plausible emergency/exigent circumstances situation, law enforcement has considerable leeway.

    Not opining as to whether that's good or bad or whether the lines could be drawn differently, just describing reality.
     

    88GT

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 29, 2010
    16,643
    83
    Familyfriendlyville
    What's new? When was a suicidal person with the means to commit suicide not an exigent circumstance? When you tell your doctor you might as well blow your brains out, he may go ahead and take you seriously.

    In Indiana, we don't get a warrant for mental health issues. You get a mental writ, which is a lot more complicated to get than a warrant, requiring doctors' signatures and a judge's signature.

    I wouldn't think that suicidal tendencies alone would be exigent circumstances.
     

    Destro

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 10, 2011
    3,996
    113
    The Khyber Pass
    I wouldn't think that suicidal tendencies alone would be exigent circumstances.

    They aren't, but....


    Sutterfield's doctor called police after Sutterfield left an appointment by saying she might as well go home and "blow her brains out," after Sutterfield had gotten some bad news. Sutterfield was wearing an empty gun holster to the appointment, so her doctor assumed Sutterfield had a gun.

    So she had a means, motive, and plan.
     

    pudly

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    Nov 12, 2008
    13,329
    83
    Undisclosed
    Just another reason to not tell your doctor that you own guns. Would the police have done a similar entry if no guns were involved?
     
    Top Bottom