3 Demotte dogs shot

[1775usmarine]

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/425...9d94404e71c132!2m2!1d-87.2233776!2d41.2027169

The distance using the above link from Doc if the woman's house and the deer farm to show the distance.

 

[mom45]

https://beaconbeta.schneidercorp.co...&PageTypeID=1&PageID=3843&KeyValue=0150055100

here is what I believe is her house on the GIS map. It is clearly NOT next to a deer farm. I can see how it was not a quick thing to return the dogs.

From what I read, these dogs were a mile and a half from home. It was not an immediate neighbor so he may not have even known who owned them.

 

[Indy317]

OK, so I own livestock, fenced, on my property and because others might be irresponsible and have access to social media I am to buy pepper ball guns, have extra fencing, wear a video camera at all times, have every type of agency on my smart phone, kept on me at all times..............or I'm to be of fault?

I never said anyone was at fault. I just said that with the way things are today, one might want to consider the backlash for taking a specific course of action. The deer farmer had the law on his side to do what he did. I strongly support a property owners rights, and I wouldn't be supporting a law changing. That being said, I also support a person's right to freedom of speech and association. I don't consider it irresponsible if someone chooses to voice their displeasure to a business who is connected with someone they disagree with. Threats are completely out-of-line, but if others choose to voice their support or displeasure to others over their connection with the deer farmers business, they have that right. If these people decide to stop dealing or associating with the deer farmer, such is life. Actions, even good and legal ones, have consequences.

I can't type what I really want to say.

Do you think others are allowed to have an opinion on an incident just because the authorities say that they feel it was within the confines of the law?

The lack of logic.... and other on the FB posts...............

I wish more people would reach a certain point of stupidity and then spontaneously combust.
Talk about some global warming!

Damn that first amendment and free speech!

 

[patience0830]

I took a quick glance at the article and fb page and there is NO information one way or the other stating why he has caged deer. You sir, et al, made a huge assumption yourselves that he Isn't raising them to cage hunt just as I did when I said "probably". To quote you, "Liberal tactics at their best". Funny how when someone who does it but supports your side is righteous but when someone who does it that doesn't support your side is a "liberal". I made a statement regarding canned hunting, it's an opinion. If my opinion so offends you well, oops, I've already gotten over it! I'm not ashamed for you, I'm used to it by now.

My purple is broke, dude. Why the guy has deer in a cage seemed kind of immaterial to the thread. If it's legal and he abides by the rules, why are you butthurt about it? And why are you changing the subject to canned hunts-vs-dog owners responsibility.

I think people who participate in canned hunts miss the point of hunting too, but it isn't my business if it's legal and they choose to do it. It doesn't hurt me. And it isn't pertinent to the thread.

 

[Fargo]

Damn that first amendment and free speech!

Unless Hookeye is really the govt, what does the 1st Amendment have to do with his feelings on FB stupidity?

 

[1775usmarine]

My purple is broke, dude. Why the guy has deer in a cage seemed kind of immaterial to the thread. If it's legal and he abides by the rules, why are you butthurt about it? And why are you changing the subject to canned hunts-vs-dog owners responsibility.

I think people who participate in canned hunts miss the point of hunting too, but it isn't my business if it's legal and they choose to do it. It doesn't hurt me. And it isn't pertinent to the thread.

See post 99 to see why he has caged deer. Its whats left of his website since the SJW's has decided to slander him out of a living.

 

[Hookeye]

Yup, people can do biz with folks based on whatever reasons they want.

Those that think the deer owner was in error.............I wouldn't do business with.

If I was in the market to buy a deer.............he'd be top o' the list

 

[Hookeye]

I doubt the SJW's are influencing his business negatively.

He's getting a lot of free publicity.

Those that would be his customers........ probably not influenced by the critics.

Proly a new website soon........The Deer Semen Demon of Demotte.

 

[AGarbers]

This frustrates me to no end. I have had farm animals killed by neighbors dogs that jumped our fences, even after I repeatedly asked them to keep them contained. Ask yourself what you would do if I had a 100-pound rooster and it came over in your yard and was pecking your pets to death. Our farm animals were pets, no less than your dogs.
Once dogs get together, they have the pack mentality and will do things you never thought they were capable of. I have seen it with the cute cuddly neighbor dogs that used to head for my house as soon as the neighbors left for work.
Not that it should matter, but the deer farmer may be raising them as livestock. Indiana does have bison, elk, and deer farms for the commercial market. Just chasing the animals can stress them enough to kill them. Biting them can cause damage enough that the animal or animals have to be put down. And dogs rarely stop at one animal. Entire herds of goats, sheep, or other farm animals have been slain buy "friendly" pets.
The local LEOs told me that that pet owner can be liable for fines amounting to three times the value of the animal damaged or slain.
The point is, your dog isn't cute and lovable to me so keep it on your own property.

 

[Hookeye]

Who started the FB sh*tstorm?

If the dog owner, then I'd view her like Brown's stepdad standing on a car yelling "Burn this place down!"

Friggin' terrorists.

 

[Hookeye]

Stray on my property, threatening me or my property............becomes my property.
Deeded by a bullet.

 

[churchmouse]

Years ago, dog owners would put their own animals down if they attacked livestock even once. It was said that once they tasted blood, they would always want to go back for more. They could never be trusted again.

Great G-Dd always said once an egg sucking dog....always an egg sucker....."BOOM"

 

[Hookeye]

Quick, somebody shoot a panda named Cecil so the FB mob leaves the deer farmer alone !

 

[churchmouse]

I never said anyone was at fault. I just said that with the way things are today, one might want to consider the backlash for taking a specific course of action. The deer farmer had the law on his side to do what he did. I strongly support a property owners rights, and I wouldn't be supporting a law changing. That being said, I also support a person's right to freedom of speech and association. I don't consider it irresponsible if someone chooses to voice their displeasure to a business who is connected with someone they disagree with. Threats are completely out-of-line, but if others choose to voice their support or displeasure to others over their connection with the deer farmers business, they have that right. If these people decide to stop dealing or associating with the deer farmer, such is life. Actions, even good and legal ones, have consequences.



Do you think others are allowed to have an opinion on an incident just because the authorities say that they feel it was within the confines of the law?



Damn that first amendment and free speech!

If what you feel is Free speech actually slanders or threatens me it goes to a whole new level.

 

[churchmouse]

Just stopping in to again ask we stay on point and civil.

Boundary's are in place and lets observe them.

This is a hot button and emotional topic.

Carry on.......

 

[Harleyrider_50]

Yup, people can do biz with folks based on whatever reasons they want.

Those that think the deer owner was in error.............I wouldn't do business with.

If I was in the market to buy a deer.............he'd be top o' the list

Uhhhh......?......beg ta differ.......

(if yer in NV.....yer good ta go..... )

 

[pudly]

Quick, somebody shoot a panda named Cecil so the FB mob leaves the deer farmer alone !

Hey!

Don't mess with the panda. We shoot back!

Of if you try to sneak up from behind, we go all Kung Fu panda!

 

[ruger1800]

Do counties still require dogs owners to pay dog tax, they use the fund to pay for livestock killed by dogs

 

[Hookeye]

The fact that others are reacting emotionally is THE hot topic.
The shooting of threats to property... meh.

 

[Fargo]

Do counties still require dogs owners to pay dog tax, they use the fund to pay for livestock killed by dogs

Don't know, I believe that part of IC 15-20-2 was removed a couple years ago but I don't know if it was just moved to a different chapter of the code.