Your thoughts on these revolvers?

[BayonetOfStJamesGreater]

I saw these revolvers with the barrel connecting to the bottom most chamber in the cylinder.

A company named Chiappa in Italy produces them.

I'd like to get a feel for one, but don't know where anyone would have one. I'm in Tippecanoe County.

They have a smaller model for conceal carry as well as bigger models.

Any idea where I'd be able to handle one, even possibly try it at a range? Anyone else here already try it? What did you think of it?

 

[SERparacord]

Rhino, never saw one or used one. It is an interesting concept though.

Chiappa Firearms

 

[BayonetOfStJamesGreater]

Rhino, never saw one or used one. It is an interesting concept though.

Chiappa Firearms

Yep, that one.

The handle doesn't seem very ergonomic. I could be wrong. Guess I'll have to wait until I can handle one.

 

[SERparacord]

Yep, that one.

The handle doesn't seem very ergonomic. I could be wrong. Guess I'll have to wait until I can handle one.

The grip does look a little strange. I've yet to see one in the LGS to handle.

 

[Double T]

I've heard they are more hype than function. YMMV of course.

 

[Six Forty-Two]

I saw three different models at the gun show in Lafayette yesterday. I had held one at the Indy 1500 about a year ago and again yesterday. The balance is different than other revolvers. I don't care for them, but that is just holding them, not shooting them. They seem bulky and overpriced. I don't think I will ever buy one.

 

[Wysko]

The one I did see looked cheap to my eyes. Didnt like the feel of the grip. Too bulky for me to carry. Has many good reviews thogh.

 

[Mackey]

Yeah, not really interested. Just strange looking. I wouldn't mind testing one ...

 

[dhw9am]

OK

I have read some good reports on these.
However, if they are anything like their 22lr pistols -STAY AWAY!

 

[24Carat]

How much ?

 

[pokersamurai]

My LSG has a few with some different barrel lengths. When I handled them I thought they were surprisingly ergonomic considering the look of their unconventional grips. They also appeared to be very sturdy and well built.
However, I don't think I'd ever own one. Personally, I think they are incredibly ugly. Also, the internal design just seems to complex and easy to break.


After all, if you take away the reliability and good looks of the revolver what advantages do you have left.

 

[Jeremiah]

My roomate had one for a while, very comfortable to hold, shoot, and fondle. it was reasonably accurate. I did find the cylinder release a bit difficult, and the crane seemed a bit flimsy. when shooting for longer periods I found myself wishing I could access the trigger with my middle finger. While dryfireing this was more comfortable, but left the index finger in harms way.

 

[TTravis]

I don't see any advantage to their design. Looks like the hammer might be more complex.

 

[melensdad]

I don't see any advantage to their design. Looks like the hammer might be more complex.

The theoretical advantage is that it has a MUCH LOWER recoil, consequently follow up shots can be made much faster and more accurately because the muzzle flip is minimized.

 

[stacy]

Never seen one until this thread, I can't say anything good or bad just looks alittle wierd to me. If it does'nt please my eyes I won't buy it.

 

[LP1]

At the last 1500, one of the larger local dealers (can't remember which one) had one on their table. Whenever someone showed the slightest interest, the vendor would come over and say "I'll make you a great deal because I really want to move it". Sounds like it's not a hot seller.

 

[dbrier]

I held them, they are much nicer in the hand than they appear. I would love to get one, but I want the 40DS. Most of the reviews are very favorable and felt recoil is greatly reduced. I know I'm in the minority, but l like the look.

 

[gunman41mag]

I rather have a time proven SMITH & WESSON 357

 

[Regionnus Rattis]

The theoretical advantage is that it has a MUCH LOWER recoil, consequently follow up shots can be made much faster and more accurately because the muzzle flip is minimized.

There's nothing like the looks of a classic .357 magnum, like a S&W. As long as one practices, muzzle flip isn't an issue. Besides, that first shot from a magnum should be the only one needed. If a second one is needed, you probably have time to follow up, because of the damage done from the first shot

 

[shooter521]

[ame]http://youtu.be/zuSOZk5JnRw[/ame]

I got to shoot a 4" .357 Rhino earlier this year. It does work as advertised in that muzzle flip is greatly reduced, BUT there is still a straight push that you feel in the forearms and elbows more than in the hands and wrists.

We had a couple of them come through when they were first released, but have elected not to carry them on a regular basis. The relatively high price point and the difficulty in finding holsters and accessories are a couple big strikes against it. As is, to some folks, the Chiappa name.