We're not really saying what SHOULD have happened, or COULD have happened, we're trying to interpret the LEO's logic.
The LEO stated he took the bullets for the safety of the OP since he had a head injury. This did not serve his intended purpose of not letting the OP accidentally injure himself or others as he was easily able to make the gun dangerous to himself again simply with another magazine. (in the mind of the LEO)
I'm not sure he should have even confiscated anything (esp since separate thread states you can legally carry and be drinking alcohol),
=NOT
TO
Just because the execution left a little to be desired it doesn't mean the entire premise is wrong.
The reasoning is EXACTLY the same. Both are deadly weapons & could be used irresponsibly to injure the individual or especially others by someone whose mental state is reasonably called into question.
^^^THIS^^^
If the $2 worth of ammo is that important go pick it up ...
If you know where to buy 16 rounds for 2 dollars, please PM me.
I can't believe some people are okay with what the officer did. It was wrong, he had no right and his actions accomplished nothing. His actions are equal to one of those feel good firearm laws. You know the ones, they don't actually do anything they are just there to placate the masses.
It seemed like the OP didn't give it up because he had a head injury. He gave it up because he wanted it safely kept while he went to the hospital. The officer made the decision that giving a fiream to a person with a head injury was a good idea as long as it wasn't loaded. Well, we've shown that what the officer intended did not happen.
Them's the non-judgmental facts.
What did the officer intend?
I have been pulled over a couple of times and I always make the officer aware that I have a ltch and a firearm on my persons. Both times they have ran my serial numbers, checked my permit and unloaded my pistol and fully unloaded my magazine.
They have given me my bullets and pistol back and when I asked both why they unloaded my gun...They stated it was for their protection.
Well in my opinion......if their safety was at risk, it would have been when they walked to my window....not after they took my gun from my possesion to run the numbers....
Just didn't make sense to me.
Agreed. Not to mention, when a LEO asks for the handgun, he is giving the citizen permission to handle a weapon in his/her presence. Wouldn't that be a perfect time for a bad guy to shoot the Officer?
Yep, I've had an officer stand in front of me arms folded, asking me to draw my gun and unload it in front of him... standing on a concrete surface... at lunchtime in a crowded area... for his safety.
Not giving a receipt is unreasonable, and at the time, they did not know I had a concussion. Everything checked out, and the EMTs seemed to think everything was okay. Later I went to the hospital on my own (have you seen the EMT bills?) and the doctor was pretty frustrated that I didnt come in earlier, because he said I pretty obviously had a concussion.
The truck did not. I fell asleep at the wheel and drifted into the oncoming lane. If you saw my car at all, I am sure you would agree that it is nothing short of a miracle that I walked away. I had the cruise control set at 55mph, and I am sure the truck was doing about the same.