In the ER I would treat them for an emergency
Wow what school?
My doctorate is in physics but I thought the Hippocratic Oath was still part of the MD cirriculum. Guess not.
Wow what school?
My doctorate is in physics but I thought the Hippocratic Oath was still part of the MD cirriculum. Guess not.
So you wouldn't refuse them service? Why not? Two posts ago you wrote that you would.
WTF? What are you smoking?
laws mandate I see every person who walks in the door. They would get seen, appropriate workup done to exclude emergencies and then they would leave.
So you wouldn't refuse them service like you wrote that you would? That is comforting.
In my profession I have no idea who ultimately benefits from my work and I like it that way.
Being principaled is not easy I'll grant you that.
Is this thread still going on? Ridiculous!
Would this still be going on if the vendor just had a little sign on her booth?
No Service to Racist Mother****ing Snowflakes
I would have done the same thing she did. She shouldn't be ashamed for doing what is right even if it means getting fired.
I will not stand for racism of any kind. I don't get along with racists or *******s or rude people. I go out of my way NOT to be around them. I've had to do it for too many years while biting my tongue because of work.
No more for me.
I'm too old and crotchety to let people walk over others without getting in the middle of it.
We have way more important things to do in life than cater to a bunch of liberal racists looking for a free ride, cloaked by the guilt of some imaginary white privilege crap.
BLM= Toxic Souls. Generations of dark Hatred being pasted down.
Just chilling checking in from Europe. I see the battle still is raging. Lol.
My mind probably won't be changed either based on the words of faceless internet personalities....Hell, according to uber contributor of relevant information , JDT, I don't even exist.
In a private property instance, I'd agree. If working under the umbrella of a government event, on govt property, it most certainly isn't his rules.
I guess I'd rather let the people who run ball game companies decide what their patrons want rather than dictate to them from the peanut gallery. I'd also rather have leaders who, if it turns out to be economically wise to invest tax dollars in ball game companies, are smart enough to set some conditions on those dollars up front so we aren't in the position of funding absurd positions.