Why the Revolutionary War Was Bad

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • YoungGunLover

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jun 11, 2012
    188
    18
    Southern Indiana
    I was doing a little reading and came across this. I just shook my head the whole time reading the article. I know it is about 4 years old, but the ideas from the article holds true even more today with the "progressive" movement and how they think. Sorry if this has been posted before, but I don't recall seeing it anytime within the last year.

    Untold Truths About the American Revolution | The Progressive
     

    Jarhead77

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jan 23, 2012
    1,390
    38
    Noblesville
    Writer is spinning the story pretty hard. Canada is NOT an example to make analogies with, do some reading and learn the history!

    He is telling it in a very one sided fashion! Why did Lexington and Concord happen?

    Another hater at work!!!
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    The title of the website tells us much. As for the content, no surprises. Of course Canada will be held up as a sterling example given that its people are much more sheepified than ours (which is a critical goal of 'progressives') and it is more socialistic, at least until we see how ObamaCare shakes out. I would be remiss in failing to point out that a major part of Canada's funding available for socialist nonsense comes from the fact that we carry a significant part of the burden of Canada's defense. While Canada has not completely abdicated its own defense, it is clearly not capable of handling a war on its own. This author clearly prefers living on his knees to dying on his feet, as demonstrated by the fact that he does not consider liberty worth dying for and does not have a problem with being a serf/second-class citizen/subject which is exactly what our colonial forebears were prior to the revolution. He can prefer as he chooses. Dave does not bow and scrape or beg and grovel.
     

    cobber

    Parrot Daddy
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    44   0   0
    Sep 14, 2011
    10,342
    149
    PR-WLAF
    So Zinn's argument is that an empire is preferable to a republic.

    Wonder how all the people of color colonized by that empire in the 18th and 19th centuries felt about that?

    Zinn conflates history into what is an unknowable instant. For instance arguing that Canada today is a swell place to live. However, Canada in 1775 was a British company town, run for the shareholders of the Hudson's Bay Company. The entire purpose of Canada was to trap and process beaver pelts to make gentlemen's hats (until the 1840s when Prince Albert donned a silk hat and beaver fur was no longer needed). Beavers were virtually exterminated by the Canadians. And the Canadian record with native persons was no better than the American, continuing to the present. The other North American colonies for the most part specialized in the extraction of wealth for the benefit of London. Apparently serfdom is okay, in Zinn's book.

    Zinn is representative of the revisionist school that grew out of the campus activism of the 60s and 70s. He is typical of the profs that are teaching your sons and daughters in college today. He is not the most absurd however. Peruse any of the 'professional' journals these days, and you will see where your tuition dollars go. You won't be happy, though.

    Universities are like sausage factories. If you inspected the inner workings, you would never want to consume the end product.
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,268
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    So Zinn's argument is that an empire is preferable to a republic.

    If you wish to command rather than contract. If you wish to be a Baron or maybe even a Marquis. Or, if you want to pull the strings of power and have people listen to you, is not empire the optimal arrangement?

    As a professor he can be a court advisor and tell the Emperor how to manage the serfs.

    It is the worship of the Power of Man. Same old story since the Garden.:D
     

    mikem1

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Mar 13, 2013
    72
    8
    sorry that was the worst thing I have ever read about the war for independents.
    but the word progessive usually makes me skip over it . . .
     
    Last edited:

    cobber

    Parrot Daddy
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    44   0   0
    Sep 14, 2011
    10,342
    149
    PR-WLAF
    Of course Canada will be held up as a sterling example given that its people are much more sheepified than ours (which is a critical goal of 'progressives') and it is more socialistic, at least until we see how ObamaCare shakes out.

    Canada was sheepifed from the outset. You came to Canada as a laborer, serving at the pleasure of the London shareholders. You treated management as nobility. There weren't industrial actions, strikes, or negotiations. Some of the creole employees would just walk off and live with the natives, but as a European employee, that option was not open to you.

    Canadians never had a tradition of settlement on/past the frontier, as Americans did. You simply did not have that option/freedom in Canada. So you were 'protected' by the Company, which in turn depended on the Crown. When your contract expired, you might return home, or stay as a laborer. There was some settlement along the St. Lawrence, but you would have no farming/homesteading skills and probably no family to give mutual support.

    The US and Canada are in no way historically comparable. Zinn is woefully ignorant of Canadian history, or deliberately misleads to bolster his demi-argument.

    I think the former. He shouldn't venture into terra incognita without his GPS.
     

    spencer rifle

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    70   0   0
    Apr 15, 2011
    6,815
    149
    Scrounging brass
    About the New Press People’s History series editor: - Hiroshima/Nagasaki apologist and a fan of redistributionist taxation, Howard Zinn described himself as "something of an anarchist, something of a socialist. Maybe a democratic socialist." His book, A People’s History of the United States, has been called “… a synthesis of the radical and revisionist historiography of the past decade…” “Writing in Dissent, Georgetown University history professor Michael Kazin argued that Zinn is too focused on class conflict, and wrongly attributes sinister motives to the American political elite. He characterized the book as an overly simplistic narrative of elite villains and oppressed people, with no attempt to understand historical actors in the context of the time in which they lived.” - from an unpublished book review
     

    jwh20

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    28   0   0
    Feb 22, 2013
    2,069
    48
    Hamilton County Indi
    I was doing a little reading and came across this. I just shook my head the whole time reading the article. I know it is about 4 years old, but the ideas from the article holds true even more today with the "progressive" movement and how they think. Sorry if this has been posted before, but I don't recall seeing it anytime within the last year.

    Untold Truths About the American Revolution | The Progressive

    Consider the source! Zinn is a well known "revisionist" historian and a connsumate liberal-elitist academic.

    He'd have been advising FDR to negotiate peace with Japan after Pearl Harbor. His hero is the milquetoast Neville Chamberlain and his "peace in our time" treaty with Adolph Hitler.

    Really, do you expect anything more from a person like this?
     

    Streck-Fu

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    20   0   0
    Jul 2, 2010
    903
    28
    Noblesville
    Consider the source! Zinn is a well known "revisionist" historian and a connsumate liberal-elitist academic.

    He'd have been advising FDR to negotiate peace with Japan after Pearl Harbor. His hero is the milquetoast Neville Chamberlain and his "peace in our time" treaty with Adolph Hitler.

    Really, do you expect anything more from a person like this?

    What a sucker he was....
     

    jbombelli

    ITG Certified
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    May 17, 2008
    13,057
    113
    Brownsburg, IN
    If you wish to command rather than contract. If you wish to be a Baron or maybe even a Marquis. Or, if you want to pull the strings of power and have people listen to you, is not empire the optimal arrangement?

    As a professor he can be a court advisor and tell the Emperor how to manage the serfs.

    It is the worship of the Power of Man. Same old story since the Garden.:D

    Or... he could find himself working in the fields as a slave until he dies, or dancing at the end of a rope, depending on who's actually in charge and their view of the intelligentsia.
     

    $mooth

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Mar 27, 2010
    662
    16
    Texas
    Interesting perspective. seems off to me, but similar to US history textbooks that paint everything the US did as saintly.
     

    KevinJ

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 8, 2012
    55
    6
    Say what you will about Canada they do have 2 things going for them:
    That french fry breakfast with the gravy and cheese! Yum
    They did help out a bit with our people in Iran.
     

    $mooth

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Mar 27, 2010
    662
    16
    Texas
    Say what you will about Canada they do have 2 things going for them:
    That french fry breakfast with the gravy and cheese! Yum
    They did help out a bit with our people in Iran.

    Poutine is not a breakfast dish, but I've had it as such before.

    Americans do like to make fun of the Canadian military. They are smaller, but quite well trained (see JTF2). I would say they are slightly under gunned, but not terribly given their role in the world. The US is heavily over gunned, but a lot of that is due to backing up our interventionist policies.

    As for Freedom, Canada is about on par with the US. They hit some of the biggies, but the US caters to a lot of special interests and protecting companies. For light reading:Canada Economy: Population, GDP, Inflation, Business, Trade, FDI, Corruption
     

    nawainwright

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 23, 2009
    1,096
    38
    New Hampshire
    After having read the article, I wonder how this person ever got published....anywhere. His writing style is jolted, his points are garbled, and he never really makes much of an argument. As a pastor, I write a sermon a week, far longer than this diatribe. If I were to give a message, written like this, on any given Sunday, I might not have a job. I have read articles by middle-schoolers who articulated their ideas better than this buffoon.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    After having read the article, I wonder how this person ever got published....anywhere. His writing style is jolted, his points are garbled, and he never really makes much of an argument. As a pastor, I write a sermon a week, far longer than this diatribe. If I were to give a message, written like this, on any given Sunday, I might not have a job. I have read articles by middle-schoolers who articulated their ideas better than this buffoon.

    You are right, but so long as it says what his masters want to hear and the sheep buy it, it could be written in pig latin for all they care.
     
    Top Bottom