Adding Walgreen's to my "no go" list. Thanks.
Letter sent:
(I had to guess at the store as well, since the town was not named in the story. For those interested, it's on Napier Ave. in Benton Harbor, MI)
Blessings,
Bill
I really hope he wins, and huge, maybe then they would let the employees who have a permit carry.
Suspect the reason they (Walgreens and just about any other biz) does not let their employees carry is more due to insuranace (ie. customer falls on wet floor in store, employee is hurt on the job, etc. that type of insurance) then not believing in self-defense.
I really hope he wins, and huge, maybe then they would let the employees who have a permit carry.
Jedi, I know exactly why Walgreen's doesn't let employees carry. Simply put, lawsuits from being shot while unarmed working at a store only pay about 1/8 the amount of what an employee shooting a customer cost. Even being killed while working at a store is only going to pay out a few hundred thousand, maybe a million with a great lawyer (the stories that make national attention are few and far between, and even then companies don't generally pay out till the family is in dire need of money and take a lower settlement just because they need the cash, they like to stall for a better deal). While a customer being accidentally killed by an employee with a gun is gonna pay out in the high teens in millions. Do not ask me how I found this out, I will not tell you what lawyer I was discussing this with.
When looking at store policies, follow the money.
BG runs back to the front of the store and out the store with BG2. But what the heck was the employee (who had his hands up) running towards the front of the store for? Also what did he pick up along the way seems like it was kicked how the aisle?
The robber pulled the trigger three times? The robber effectively tried to kill the pharmacist three times. Thank God the gun malfunctioned. Each click must have felt like thunder. The pharmacist had three really good reasons for returning fire.