US Appeals Court rules gay marriage bans in WI and IN unconstitutional.

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    mrjarrell

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    19,986
    63
    Hamilton County
    It was pretty much a foregone conclusion that the court was going to rule this way. Judge Posner had made it pretty clear in his questioning that the defenders of these ludicrous bans didn't have a leg to stand on and that their arguments were nonsensical at best. No doubt they two states will want to keep wasting our tax dollars and continue their defence of these laws all the way up the chain, hoping that the SCOTUS will be populated with people who share their delusions.
     

    ArcadiaGP

    Wanderer
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jun 15, 2009
    31,729
    113
    Indianapolis
    It was pretty much a foregone conclusion that the court was going to rule this way. Judge Posner had made it pretty clear in his questioning that the defenders of these ludicrous bans didn't have a leg to stand on and that their arguments were nonsensical at best. No doubt they two states will want to keep wasting our tax dollars and continue their defence of these laws all the way up the chain, hoping that the SCOTUS will be populated with people who share their delusions.

    Thought I saw a headline yesterday of a gay marriage ban in some state that was ruled constitutional. I expect them all to eventually be unconstitutional, but a few seem to be slipping through.
     

    mrjarrell

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    19,986
    63
    Hamilton County
    Thought I saw a headline yesterday of a gay marriage ban in some state that was ruled constitutional. I expect them all to eventually be unconstitutional, but a few seem to be slipping through.
    It was Louisiana and the judge will likely be overturned on appeal. He used the ludicrous "tradition" assertion that Wisconsin tried.
     

    K_W

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Aug 14, 2008
    5,407
    83
    Indy / Carmel
    This fight was over from the start, some just won't quit. "Gay marriage" bans have always been unconstitutional, it's just now becoming official. Legislating others lives based on your religious beliefs is not how this country works.

    If conservatives continue to pitch fits about this, they will lose the confidence of the younger generations who have grown up around openly gay people without harm.
     

    j706

    Master
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    60   0   1
    Dec 4, 2008
    4,161
    48
    Lizton
    If someone wants to be a homo then I say knock yourself out. But NO ONE will ever make me think it is OK, cool, acceptable or whatever. It is morally and naturally wrong and no one even needs to tell anyone that it is. Disgusting stuff.
     

    K_W

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Aug 14, 2008
    5,407
    83
    Indy / Carmel
    If someone wants to be a homo then I say knock yourself out. But NO ONE will ever make me think it is OK, cool, acceptable or whatever. It is morally and naturally wrong and no one even needs to tell anyone that it is. Disgusting stuff.

    That's fine you think that, that is your right. It creeps me out too, but it's between consenting adults. No one can punish or discriminate against them for it.

    Do gay rights trump private property rights... I don't believe they do. I think the gay rights people will do themselves no good demanding everyone cater to them.
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,177
    149
    Valparaiso
    Seems like a time to pass a State Sovereignty Bill like others have done.

    We need something other than the 10th Amendment interpreted according to its original intent?

    I've never been a big fan of matters for legislation being turn into Constitutional rights, thereby end-running republican principles...and this is just one more example. Unfortunately, both the left and the right prefer bench-made law when they feel vulnerable in the legislature or at the ballot box.

    Well, the state didn't invent marriage, so how it defines it is of little concern to me. Indiana may have to recognize this; I don't.
     

    zippy23

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    27   0   0
    May 20, 2012
    1,815
    63
    Noblesville
    Seems like a lot of people on here are for this. What happened to states rights? Marriage is not in the constitution. The states have the RIGHT to decide on this. This is a political issue, the judges who vote either way are doing it based on their political views, not on what is constitutional. Keep in mind that if there are ever a bunch of right wing judges who will vote solely on political views, and they get in power, then the door swings both ways. We should be for what the states want, other than what is given in the constitution. Thats how it was set up, thats what made the country great. Its too bad everything is political
     

    inxs

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 27, 2008
    269
    18
    This is just the same stuff that hasn't been settled since the 1820's. Are we a group of states bound together for our own good, or are we a group of people under a federal government?

    I don't know why they just don't get a federal marriage license. (yeah, I know)
     

    MisterChester

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 25, 2013
    3,383
    48
    The Compound
    Seems like a lot of people on here are for this. What happened to states rights? Marriage is not in the constitution. The states have the RIGHT to decide on this. This is a political issue, the judges who vote either way are doing it based on their political views, not on what is constitutional. Keep in mind that if there are ever a bunch of right wing judges who will vote solely on political views, and they get in power, then the door swings both ways. We should be for what the states want, other than what is given in the constitution. Thats how it was set up, thats what made the country great. Its too bad everything is political

    A state doesn't have rights, it has powers.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom